The line graph above illustrates variations in the average prices of food and oil on a global scale in 11 years from 2000 to 2011.
Overall, there’re striking similarities in the way two values change through over one decade, which show the clearest difference in only two periods, from 2005 to 2007, and in the year of 2009.
Both values remained quite similar and stable in three-year time between 2000 and 2003 with the variation between 84 and 95 points in food price index and the average oil price varied between 20 and 37 US dollars per barrel. From 2004 to mid-2006, food prices rose slowly and steadily, with 105 points in 2004 to about 139 in 2007. Oil, however, showed a stronger jump, which almost doubled in prices, from 30 to more than 70 dollars per barrel in just more than two years.
From 2007 to 2009, there were sudden changes in all values mentioned above. Food and oil prices increased considerably, with the later peaked in the middle of 2008, 130 US dollars. Food prices reached the highest of 8 years with 218 points from just 115 in 2007. The other half of the period, however, was a sharp decline, from 140 to almost 65 dollars per barrel for oil prices and from 218 to 118 points for food. From 2009 to 2011 all two showed tendency to rise, significantly in the other half of 2010, with food prices at the highest of 135 points in 2011 and oil went up about more than 30 dollars per barrel.
The line graph above illustrates variations in the average prices of food and oil on a global scale in 11 years from 2000 to 2011.
Overall, there’re striking similarities in the way two values change through over one decade, which show the clearest difference in only two periods, from 2005 to 2007, and in the year of 2009.
Both values remained quite similar and stable in three-year time between 2000 and 2003 with the variation between 84 and 95 points in food price index and the average oil price varied between 20 and 37 US dollars per barrel. From 2004 to mid-2006, food prices rose slowly and steadily, with 105 points in 2004 to about 139 in 2007. Oil, however, showed a stronger jump, which almost doubled in prices, from 30 to more than 70 dollars per barrel in just more than two years.
From 2007 to 2009, there were sudden changes in all values mentioned above. Food and oil prices increased considerably, with the later peaked in the middle of 2008, 130 US dollars. Food prices reached the highest of 8 years with 218 points from just 115 in 2007. The other half of the period, however, was a sharp decline, from 140 to almost 65 dollars per barrel for oil prices and from 218 to 118 points for food. From 2009 to 2011 all two showed tendency to rise, significantly in the other half of 2010, with food prices at the highest of 135 points in 2011 and oil went up about more than 30 dollars per barrel.
- The pie charts compare home ownership and renting for 1991 and 2007 in percentage terms. In 1991,home owner were the most popular type of housing, accounting for 60%, or more than over half of allhomes. The next largest sector was social rented homes, amo 78
- The table above compares the differences in the sales of coffee and banana whose Fairtrade labels had been attached in five countries in Europe in the two years of 1999 and 2004.It is clear that over the five-year period, the UK is still ranked the highes 73
- The first line graph shows the average monthly spending on children s sports by their parents from 2008 to 2014 while the second one presents the amount of children participating in football athletics and swimming in the UK at the same time It is clear fr 82
- This table gives information about the forest area in some parts of the world for 15 years from 1995 to 2005.It is clear from the table that millions of hectares of land to be used to plant forest all over the regions, but it is tending to decline.In 1990 89
- The first line graph shows the average monthly spending on children’s sports by their parents from 2008 to 2014 while the second one presents the amount of children participating in football, athletics and swimming in the UK at the same time.It is clear 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 12, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error - use third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'graphs'.
Suggestion: graphs
The line graph above illustrates variations in the ave...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...2005 to 2007, and in the year of 2009. Both values remained quite similar and s...
^^
Line 4, column 476, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...per barrel in just more than two years. From 2007 to 2009, there were sudden cha...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 59.0 33.7804878049 175% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1175.0 965.302439024 122% => OK
No of words: 260.0 196.424390244 132% => OK
Chars per words: 4.51923076923 4.92477711251 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01553427287 3.73543355544 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.25720083761 2.65546596893 85% => OK
Unique words: 135.0 106.607317073 127% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.519230769231 0.547539520022 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 311.4 283.868780488 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.2 1.45097560976 83% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 9.0 3.36585365854 267% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.4073881115 43.030603864 115% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.5 112.824112599 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.0 22.9334400587 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.1 5.23603664747 21% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.449418538872 0.215688989381 208% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.190849955146 0.103423049105 185% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.170424929154 0.0843802449381 202% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.357204728817 0.15604864568 229% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.170902229372 0.0819641961636 209% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.2329268293 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 78.93 61.2550243902 129% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.23 11.4140731707 81% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.42 8.06136585366 92% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 17.5 11.4329268293 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.