The line chart below shows the percentage of people in different groups who played video games more than ten hours a week between 1984 and 2003.
Given is a line graph comparing the proportion of people who spent more than ten hours a week on playing video games in four different age groups over the period of nearly twenty years since 1984.
As can be apparently seen from the graph, the rate showed an upward trend and the age categories didn't change position in relation to each other.
During the period, 15-24 group played the most video games. At the beginning of the period, the figure for 15-24 group was responsible for slightly under 20% in 1984 and then it remained steady by around 6% until 1992. Afterwards, this figure fluctuated with an upward tendency and stood at 50% in 2003, after having reached a peak of higher than 50%. Similar trends was seen in the data on 7-14 and 25-34 group and both was lower than that on 15-24 group. It was around 13% in 7-14 year olds and 8% in 25-34 year olds in 1984, then witnessed a moderate growth of about 22% and 20% respectively in the rest of the period.
Although the figure for 35+ group was the lowest, A significant rise of 20% was seen between 1984 and 2003. It started with just over 0% but grew to approximately 23% in the next 20 years.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-07 | Cece0503 | 89 | view |
| 2019-03-31 | Hứa Mỹ Ngân | 78 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 98, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: didn't
... an upward trend and the age categories didnt change position in relation to each oth...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
apparently, but, if, then
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 33.7804878049 115% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 961.0 965.302439024 100% => OK
No of words: 214.0 196.424390244 109% => OK
Chars per words: 4.49065420561 4.92477711251 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82475343497 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.23714190721 2.65546596893 84% => OK
Unique words: 133.0 106.607317073 125% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.621495327103 0.547539520022 114% => OK
syllable_count: 256.5 283.868780488 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.2 1.45097560976 83% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.0981961696 43.030603864 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.777777778 112.824112599 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.7777777778 22.9334400587 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.77777777778 5.23603664747 53% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.26199585481 0.215688989381 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.102584285539 0.103423049105 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.125333718686 0.0843802449381 149% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.167115428942 0.15604864568 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.159097089305 0.0819641961636 194% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 13.2329268293 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 81.97 61.2550243902 134% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.5 10.3012195122 73% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.06 11.4140731707 79% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.43 8.06136585366 92% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.