The line chart below shows the production of paper, wood pulp and sawn-wood in the UK from 1980 to 2000.
The given diagram depicts the production of three categories from forest including paper, wood pulp and sawn-wood in the UK from 1980 to 2000.
Overall, paper and packing was not only the category with the highest proportion, but it also increased most significantly. Additionally, while both sawn-wood and wood pulp decreased steadily, the production of sawn-wood declined to the lowest category by the end of the period.
In 1980, the production of paper and packaging started at approximately 240 million tons and witnessed a slight rise to 250 million tons over the next ten years. From 1990 onwards, its production grew remarkably and finally ended with the figure being recorded at 350 million tons in 2000.
Sawn-wood and wood pulp started the lower period with 200 million tons for sawn-wood and roughly 170 million tons for wood pulp, after which then it saw a considerable decline to the same figure (150) in 1990. Notably, while wood pulp rebounded to about 160 million tons over the next 10 years, sawn-wood decreased continuously to below 150 million tons and became the category with lowest production in 2000.
- The table describes the changes of people who went for international travel in 1990 1995 2000 and 2005 million Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant You should write at least 150 words
- The picture illustrates the disparity of a park named Grange Park between 1920 and today 73
- The bar chart below shows the popularity of well known Instagram accounts in 2011 and 2021 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 11
- Some experts suggest that when a country is already rich any additional increase in economic wealth does not make its citizens happier To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- Some experts suggest that when a country is already rich any additional increase in economic wealth does not make its citizens happier To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, if, so, then, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 943.0 965.302439024 98% => OK
No of words: 185.0 196.424390244 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.0972972973 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.68801715136 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67870426468 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 100.0 106.607317073 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.540540540541 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 263.7 283.868780488 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.5707610074 43.030603864 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 134.714285714 112.824112599 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.4285714286 22.9334400587 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.57142857143 5.23603664747 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.437491265573 0.215688989381 203% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.230718302065 0.103423049105 223% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.163784854469 0.0843802449381 194% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.313120739925 0.15604864568 201% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.151832677984 0.0819641961636 185% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.8 13.2329268293 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 62.01 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.6 11.4140731707 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.08 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.