The line chart below shows the results of a survey giving the reasons why people moved to the capital city of a particular country.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The provided line graph presents figures on the motivations of relocation to the capital city in a specific country over a 15-year period from 2000. As is observed, the general trends for the period was of an increase to different extent.
According to the graph, employment was generally the major reason why people moved away. In 2000, roughly 60,000 people changed their location because of this and the figures experienced a ceiling trend until reaching its peak at just over 90,0000 in 2010, followed by a slight decline. Transposition to the central city on account of study saw an upsurge of its number to almost 90,000, trebling the figures in 2000 and ending the period at the same place as that of employment.
Data of relocation due to family/friends and adventure were joint-lowest at the beginning of the period. While the former doubled in 2015, the latter crawled up mildly by approximately 5,000 at the same time.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-11-26 | annais | view | |
| 2022-03-16 | okhunjon | view | |
| 2021-12-30 | Ahmad Gelora Mahardika | 84 | view |
| 2021-12-01 | Sim6595 | view | |
| 2020-11-15 | nhuhuynh123vn1 | 84 | view |
- The graph below gives information about international tourist arrivals in different parts of the world Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant millions 57
- The graph below gives information about international tourist arrivals in different parts of the world Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant millions 11
- The line chart below shows the results of a survey giving the reasons why people moved to the capital city of a particular country Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 779.0 965.302439024 81% => OK
No of words: 157.0 196.424390244 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.96178343949 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.53976893118 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76551971867 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 102.0 106.607317073 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.649681528662 0.547539520022 119% => OK
syllable_count: 233.1 283.868780488 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.8987703793 43.030603864 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.285714286 112.824112599 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.4285714286 22.9334400587 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.85714285714 5.23603664747 35% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0843578063706 0.215688989381 39% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0416086254336 0.103423049105 40% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0539151319104 0.0843802449381 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0525448121896 0.15604864568 34% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.037204754189 0.0819641961636 45% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.2329268293 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 61.2550243902 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.78 11.4140731707 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.55 8.06136585366 106% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.