The line chart below shows the results of a survey giving the reasons why people moved to the capital the city of a particular country.
The line graph illustrates the motives which caused people to migrate to the capital city of a specific country.
Overall, the main reason for relocating was employment and study throughout the period shown, while family/friends and adventure were minor reasons for doing that. It is also noticeable that the number of people moving because of study, family/friends and adventure experiences the greatest increases over the period given.
In 2000, around 60,000 people migrated because of employment, while study, family/friends, and adventure were the reasons for relocating of 25,000, 11,000, and 10,500 people respectively. In the year 2010, the number of people who moved to seek job opportunities reached a peak at around 92,000, while the figure for other solutions such as study, family/friends and adventure rose steadily to approximately 56,000, 22,000 and 12,000 respectively.
By 2015, whereas the number of people migrated to the capital city because of study, family/friends and adventure continued to increase gradually to approximately 87,000, 22,000, and 14,000, that figure for the occupational sector dropped and shared the same number with the educational sector with 87,000.
- Some people say that marriages should be arranged by intermediaries Others say that young people should be free to choose their marriage partners Which viewpoint do you agree with 84
- In many countries around the world life expectancy is increasing Discuss the advantages and disadvantages of this situation and give your own opinion Write at least 250 words 11
- To what extent does the Internet increase social cohesion 78
- Scientists agree that people are damaging their health by eating too much junk food Some people think that education for people to eat less junk food could tackle this problem Others claim that education will not work Discuss both these views and give you 78
- In recent years the family structure has changed as well as family roles What types of changes are occurring Do you think these changes are positive or negative 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, so, whereas, while, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 33.7804878049 74% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1018.0 965.302439024 105% => OK
No of words: 180.0 196.424390244 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.65555555556 4.92477711251 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.66284150148 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.08068454795 2.65546596893 116% => OK
Unique words: 100.0 106.607317073 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.555555555556 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 297.9 283.868780488 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 30.0 22.4926829268 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 65.3800853132 43.030603864 152% => OK
Chars per sentence: 169.666666667 112.824112599 150% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.0 22.9334400587 131% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.16666666667 5.23603664747 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.115812576544 0.215688989381 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0786103470307 0.103423049105 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0454227938131 0.0843802449381 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0945215865895 0.15604864568 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0486059899708 0.0819641961636 59% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 20.2 13.2329268293 153% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.57 61.2550243902 53% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.2 10.3012195122 157% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.14 11.4140731707 141% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.55 8.06136585366 106% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 10.9970731707 127% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.