The line chart demonstrates change in the four types of meat consumption (beef, pork, broilers, turkey) in US from 1955 to 2012.
The line chart demonstrates change in the four types of meat consumption (beef, pork, broilers, turkey) in US from 1955 to 2012.
In common, beef was by far the most popular type which US people use throughout the period show while Turkey was a less in daily demand over a period of 57 years. Moreover, we can see that there was considerable rise in the broilers, with figures eventually surpassing those for beef.
Between 1995 and 1976, US beef consumption rose from around to a peak of 90 pounds per person per year. During the same period, consumption of broilers also gone up, to nearly 30 pounds per person, while the figures for pork fluctuated between 50 and 40 pounds per person. Turkey had remained the same level, with number around 9-10 pounds per capita each year.
By following years, the trends in beef users experienced a moderate decline to 50 pounds in 2012. By contrast, the consumption of broilers had doubled since the 1970s, to approximately 55 pounds per capita. In addition, it could be noticed that both pork and turkey remained unchanged or fluctuated at approximately 40-50 pounds and 10 pounds respectively in consumer choices.
- A work colleague or student friend has applied for a new job and he she asked you to write a reference letter to the new employer Write a letter to the employer to recommend your colleague friend In your letter state your reason for writing and say how yo 94
- The line graph illustrates the priced changes of food and oil all over the world from 2000 to 2011 67
- The line chart demonstrates change in the four types of meat consumption beef pork broilers turkey in US from 1955 to 2012 84
- The graph shows the changes in global food and oil prices between in 2000 to 2011 67
- The line graph compares the indicators of the UK people about the moving everyday by three means bus car train over a period of 60 years 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, moreover, so, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 962.0 965.302439024 100% => OK
No of words: 197.0 196.424390244 100% => OK
Chars per words: 4.88324873096 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.74642080493 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6659364955 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 119.0 106.607317073 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.604060913706 0.547539520022 110% => OK
syllable_count: 270.9 283.868780488 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 3.36585365854 297% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 29.9349088095 43.030603864 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.888888889 112.824112599 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8888888889 22.9334400587 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.22222222222 5.23603664747 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.342603530377 0.215688989381 159% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.165156411011 0.103423049105 160% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.255822122663 0.0843802449381 303% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.303058104216 0.15604864568 194% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.335248052338 0.0819641961636 409% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.2329268293 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.02 11.4140731707 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.8 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.