The line graph compares the indicators of the UK people about the moving everyday by three means (bus, car, train) over a period of 60 years.
The line graph compares the indicators of the UK people about the moving everyday by three means (bus, car, train) over a period of 60 years.
As is observed, the car is the most popular means of transport for UK commuters throughout the period when is showed in the graph. Similarly, UK people prefer to commute daily by train because of having the moderately increase from 1970 to 2030 while the trend of travelling by bus dropped slightly and hit a low of the ended year (2030).
In the beginning year, 1970, the amount of car users was the highest, with the figure standing at 5 million while the number of commuters by Bus and train were 4 million, 2 million respectively. Over the following 30 years, the number of both car and train user gone up at 7 million and 3 million. By contrast, the data of people who used by bus slowly decline below 4 million.
By 2030, the average number of commuters by car is expected to climb dramatically and reach a peak of 9 million. In the same trend, the transportation by train remain stable at 3 million before rising gradually at approximately 5 million. However, buses are predicted to be a less popular choice, with only 3 million daily users.
- The line graph illustrates the priced changes of food and oil all over the world from 2000 to 2011 67
- A work colleague or student friend has applied for a new job and he she asked you to write a reference letter to the new employer Write a letter to the employer to recommend your colleague friend In your letter state your reason for writing and say how yo 94
- The line graph compares the indicators of the UK people about the moving everyday by three means bus car train over a period of 60 years 78
- The line chart illustrates the proportion of waste output by three companied from 2000 to 2015 73
- The graph shows the changes in global food and oil prices between in 2000 to 2011 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, similarly, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 0.0 5.60731707317 0% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 33.7804878049 124% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 978.0 965.302439024 101% => OK
No of words: 215.0 196.424390244 109% => OK
Chars per words: 4.5488372093 4.92477711251 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82921379641 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63051938477 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 122.0 106.607317073 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.567441860465 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 293.4 283.868780488 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.0040648392 43.030603864 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.666666667 112.824112599 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.8888888889 22.9334400587 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.77777777778 5.23603664747 53% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.366287037497 0.215688989381 170% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.173329024454 0.103423049105 168% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.261025103533 0.0843802449381 309% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.320361854133 0.15604864568 205% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.338683356116 0.0819641961636 413% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.2329268293 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.41 11.4140731707 82% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.64 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.