The line chart : Japanese tourists travelling abroad.
The bar chart : Australia’s share of Japan’s tourist market.
The figures elucidate the number of Japanese holidaymakers who travelled overseas and the amount of Australia share to Japan’s visitor market from 85 to 95. At first glance, it is evident that in the bar chart, the total of the tourists who come from Japan experienced a dramatic growth over the entire period, and in line graph, it experienced a sharp decline for two times.
To begin with the bar chart, there was immense progress for the number of Japanese holidaymakers to travel abroad in which it stood at just above 4 millions in 85 and achieved at well over 10 millions in 90. Afterwards, it, over the following year, plummeted sharply to less than the previous year. Erratically, it jumped tremendously between 91, which made up at just across 10 millions, and 95, which constituted at just under 16 millions.
In accordance with the line graph, 85 to 89 witnessed an immense growth for the share of Australia for Japan’s visitor market in which it finished at well above 4 in 100 in 89. Unfortunately, it plunged for two times in the next 6 years and ended at six-hundredths in 95.
- Some people think that it is good for a country's culture to import foreign movies and TV programmes. Others think that it is better to produce these locally. Discuss both views and give your opinion. 73
- The maps : the plans below show the layout of a university’s sports centre now and how it will look after redevelopment. 73
- Line graph : Clothing Export in 1999 - 2003 in Japan, Colombia and Myanmar. 78
- Some people believe that computers are more a hindrance than a help in today's world. Others feel that they are such indispensable tools that they would not be able to live or work without them.In what ways are computers a hindrance?What is your opin 61
- Some people think it is more important to plant more tree in open areas in towns and cities than provide more housing. To what extend do you agree or disagree? 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, well, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 42.0 33.7804878049 124% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 916.0 965.302439024 95% => OK
No of words: 192.0 196.424390244 98% => OK
Chars per words: 4.77083333333 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.72241943641 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89568344936 2.65546596893 109% => OK
Unique words: 106.0 106.607317073 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.552083333333 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 274.5 283.868780488 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 47.042317033 43.030603864 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.857142857 112.824112599 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.4285714286 22.9334400587 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.71428571429 5.23603664747 71% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.248923424751 0.215688989381 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.104140779877 0.103423049105 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0965502089594 0.0843802449381 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.175788213564 0.15604864568 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.107493142863 0.0819641961636 131% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 13.2329268293 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.99 61.2550243902 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.68 11.4140731707 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.43 8.06136585366 105% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 19.0 11.4329268293 166% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.