The line charts compare the number of people who emigrate and immigrate in the UK while the bar graph shows the net of migration between 1999 and 2008.
The line charts compare the number of people who emigrate and immigrate in the UK while the bar graph shows the net of migration between 1999 and 2008.
Overall, the figures for immigration were always higher than emigration, but both rates rose over 10 years. Besides, the net of migration fluctuated throughout the period.
The numbers of immigration and emigration increased steadily from 450,000 and 300,000 people in 1999 to reach a peak of 600,000 and around 400,000 people in 2006, respectively. While the figures for immigration decreased slightly to just below 600,000 people in 2008, the numbers of emigration dropped suddenly to around 350,000 people in 2007 before grew again to the highest point of nearly 420,000 people in 2008.
From 1999 to 2003, the net migration slightly varied between 150,000 and 180,000 people. In the last 5 years, except the figure was around 180,000 people in 2008, the other numbers always were higher than 200,000 and reached a peak of 250,000 people in 2004.
- The charts below show percentage of water used by different sectors in Sydney, in 1997 and 2007.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and making comparisons where relevant. 56
- The map below shows the outline of the village named Chorleywood from 1868 to 1994. 73
- The bar chart below shows the proportions of English men and women of different ages who were living alone in 2011. The pie chart compares the numbers of bedrooms in these one-person households. 61
- Many people prefer to watch foreign films rather than locally produced films. Whycould this be?Should governments give more financial support to local film industries? 56
- The tables compare the amount of money of selling coffee and bananas, in two separate years, in five difference EU nations. 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 0.0 5.60731707317 0% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 3.97073170732 227% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 848.0 965.302439024 88% => OK
No of words: 166.0 196.424390244 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.10843373494 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.58944267634 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.45673847662 2.65546596893 93% => OK
Unique words: 90.0 106.607317073 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.542168674699 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 217.8 283.868780488 77% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.7505376564 43.030603864 130% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.142857143 112.824112599 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.7142857143 22.9334400587 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.71428571429 5.23603664747 52% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.402541999763 0.215688989381 187% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.24348150032 0.103423049105 235% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.312247371079 0.0843802449381 370% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.355006481676 0.15604864568 227% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.374378818147 0.0819641961636 457% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.2329268293 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 73.51 61.2550243902 120% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 11.4140731707 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.35 8.06136585366 91% => OK
difficult_words: 27.0 40.7170731707 66% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.