The line graoh below shows the consumption of fou kinds of meat in a european country from 1978 to 2004.
The line graph represents the information about the utilization of different types of meat like fish, lamb, beef and chicken in a european country from 1979 to 2004. The data is calibrated in grams per person weekly.
It can be clearly observed that, the consumption of fish in 1979, was approximately 60 grams per person which was slightly decreased to 50 grams in 1984. From 1984 to 1994, the utilization of fish remained static to 50 grams and it further declined to 35 grams between the year 1999 to 2004. Moving ahead, the consumption of beef showed a dramatic change from 1979 to 2004. In 1979, it was near about 220 grams and cane to 249 grams suddenly in 1984. However, in 1984, the consumption of beef by european country showed a descending trend and reached to 100 grams in 2004.
On the other hand, the utilization of lamb and chicken showed opposite trend in 1979, the 150 grams per person lamb was ate by european and it slightly decreased to 60 grams in the year 2004 while in 1979, 140 grams chicken was consumed and it reached to 250 grams per person in 2004.
Overall, the maximum consumption was of chicken and minimum of fish in european country.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-02-25 | Dhillon Simran | 67 | view |
- International tourism has enormous benefits at the same time it has some concerns for local inhabitants and the environment. Do the advantages of international tourism outweigh disadvantages. 78
- The two pie charts below show the online shopping sales for retail sectors in Canada in 2005 and 2010. 78
- The diagrams below guve information on transport and car use in edmonton. 73
- The graph shows the trends in consumption of fast foods in britian. 67
- The line graph below shows the consumption of 4 kinds of meat in a european country from 1979 to 2004 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 286, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ned to 35 grams between the year 1999 to 2004. Moving ahead, the consumption of b...
^^
Line 5, column 121, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'eaten'.
Suggestion: eaten
...1979, the 150 grams per person lamb was ate by european and it slightly decreased t...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, so, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 33.7804878049 133% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 967.0 965.302439024 100% => OK
No of words: 209.0 196.424390244 106% => OK
Chars per words: 4.62679425837 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.80221413058 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.50477440669 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 92.0 106.607317073 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.44019138756 0.547539520022 80% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 259.2 283.868780488 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.2 1.45097560976 83% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 9.0 4.33902439024 207% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 65.8906688911 43.030603864 153% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.444444444 112.824112599 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.2222222222 22.9334400587 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.55555555556 5.23603664747 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.190267536238 0.215688989381 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.108182646227 0.103423049105 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0933060007069 0.0843802449381 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.135920048147 0.15604864568 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0491069483397 0.0819641961636 60% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.2329268293 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 81.97 61.2550243902 134% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.5 10.3012195122 73% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.87 11.4140731707 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.12 8.06136585366 88% => OK
difficult_words: 31.0 40.7170731707 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.