It is clear that there’s extreme contrary in the variations of the two values over the first decade of the 21st century. While more and more money was spent on cell phone service, landline phone, on the other hand, shows a tendency of steady decrease.
The year 2001 started out with almost 700 US dollars spent annually on Residential services, and only about 210 dollars in payment on those of cell phone. The following year saw a sudden rise in the budget for cell phone service for 300 dollars. In contrast, the cost of home call service showed a sharp decrease by roughly 80 dollars a year. In the next one year, cellphone service’s spending remained stable, but the residential one continued to drop rather quickly to about 610 US dollars.
The rest of the period was continuous contrary of the two values. The annual expenditures mobile phone services continued to rise significantly, which peaked at over 750 dollars in 2010. On the contrary, budget for landline phone services, kept dropping until reaching the lowest, roughly 400 dollars annually at the end of the decade.
It is clear that there’s extreme contrary in the variations of the two values over the first decade of the 21st century. While more and more money was spent on cell phone service, landline phone, on the other hand, shows a tendency of steady decrease.
The year 2001 started out with almost 700 US dollars spent annually on Residential services, and only about 210 dollars in payment on those of cell phone. The following year saw a sudden rise in the budget for cell phone service for 300 dollars. In contrast, the cost of home call service showed a sharp decrease by roughly 80 dollars a year. In the next one year, cellphone service’s spending remained stable, but the residential one continued to drop rather quickly to about 610 US dollars.
The rest of the period was continuous contrary of the two values. The annual expenditures mobile phone services continued to rise significantly, which peaked at over 750 dollars in 2010. On the contrary, budget for landline phone services, kept dropping until reaching the lowest, roughly 400 dollars annually at the end of the decade.
- The given graph illustrates how much waste is created by three companies over the course of 15 years beginning at 2000.Looking at the graph, it is immediately obvious that both companies A and B witnessed the downward trend of waste output over 15-year pe 67
- The line graph compares three companies about the term of their waste output from 2000 to 2011 It is clear that there were remarkable changes in waste output produced by all three companies as shown in the graph While companies A and B saw a decrease in w 67
- The graph below shows changes in global food and oil prices between 2000 and 2011 73
- More and more people are migrating to cities in search of a better life, but city life can be extremely difficult. Explain some of the difficulties of living in a city. How can governments make urban life better for everyone? 78
- The first line graph shows the average monthly spending on children s sports by their parents from 2008 to 2014 while the second one presents the amount of children participating in football athletics and swimming in the UK at the same time It is clear fr 82
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, while, in contrast, on the contrary, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 914.0 965.302439024 95% => OK
No of words: 185.0 196.424390244 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.94054054054 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.68801715136 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.627349552 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 113.0 106.607317073 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.610810810811 0.547539520022 112% => OK
syllable_count: 272.7 283.868780488 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 29.2907940706 43.030603864 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.555555556 112.824112599 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5555555556 22.9334400587 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.77777777778 5.23603664747 149% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.409866823854 0.215688989381 190% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.175866412573 0.103423049105 170% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.216710332373 0.0843802449381 257% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.392937396601 0.15604864568 252% => Maybe some contents are duplicated.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.409340167289 0.0819641961636 499% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.2329268293 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 61.2550243902 97% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.37 11.4140731707 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.47 8.06136585366 105% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.