The line graph below gives information about the number of visitors to three London museums between June and September 2013.
The depicted line graph enumerates the comparative data about the number of travelers to three respective London Museums for over four months.
Overall, it is evident that the figure of the British Museum had experienced a certain fluctuation over the given period, whereas the trend of science museum and natural history museum seem to have slowly declined over three months and later peaked.
To initiate, the most obvious trend had seen in the British museum, peaking from approximately 600 visitors in mid-June to nearly 750 visitors in mid-July, which later dramatically went down to exactly 600 visitors in mid-August. Lastly, the ratio of visitors had slowly risen to about 650 in September 2013.
Furthermore, the ratio of the science museum, as well as natural history museums are supposed to have a small minority difference throughout the given period, slightly diminishing from 550 and exactly 400 in June, respectively to about 450 visitors.
- The graph below shows the unemployment rates in the three countries from 1990 to 2004 70
- The table below shows the number of students living in the UK gaining English language teacher training qualification in 2007/8 and 2008/9, and the proportion of male qualifiers. 78
- The maps below show the centre of a small town called Islip as it is now, and plans for its development. 61
- The diagram below shows the changes that have taken place at Queen Mary Hospital since its construction in 1960. 67
- The graph below shows the unemployment rates in the three countries from 1990 to 2004 87
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, if, lastly, well, whereas, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 818.0 965.302439024 85% => OK
No of words: 152.0 196.424390244 77% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.38157894737 4.92477711251 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.51124308557 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73076247812 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 92.0 106.607317073 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.605263157895 0.547539520022 111% => OK
syllable_count: 249.3 283.868780488 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 5.0 8.94146341463 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 30.0 22.4926829268 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 68.306954258 43.030603864 159% => OK
Chars per sentence: 163.6 112.824112599 145% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.4 22.9334400587 133% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.0 5.23603664747 191% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.292312170739 0.215688989381 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.159464479567 0.103423049105 154% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0717853084205 0.0843802449381 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.167790868623 0.15604864568 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0744610061009 0.0819641961636 91% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.1 13.2329268293 144% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.03 61.2550243902 67% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 10.3012195122 146% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.52 11.4140731707 127% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.7 8.06136585366 120% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 40.7170731707 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.5 11.4329268293 162% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 10.9970731707 127% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.0658536585 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.