The line graph below gives information about the number of visitors to three London museums between june and september 2013.
The given line graph reveals what number of visitors per month in summer went to three london museums in the year 2013.
A quick glance at line graph is quite enough to make it clear that British museum remained most marvellous destination for tourists from june to september in 2013, rather than other two museums namely science museum and natural history museum.
In the measurement of people who visited to three different london museums, British museum became first choice of six lakh comers who climbed exponentially within next one month and gained the highest number (750000). At the same time, Science and Natural History museums were further two options of folks which were going downward direction in visitor counting in the same time and approached analogous number (350000) in july. After july science museum was witnessed of stability though Natural History museum viewers were contiously lacking and touched the lowest point (300000) in August.
However, spectacular slip back was seen in case of British museum from 750000 to 500000. In the last part of the summer, tourists again started giving priority to British museum and took it at first position with 650000 numbers. Science and Natural istory museum were attained second rank with approximately equal number (450000) in the similer time period.
- The line graph below gives information on cinema attendance in the UK. 73
- The developments in Happy valley shopping center from 1982 to 2012 is represent by maps 80
- The two pie charts below show the online shopping sales for retail sectors in canada in 2005 and 2010. 84
- The pie charts below illustrate the number of jounal articles read per week by all students, phD students and junior lecturers at an Australian university. 61
- The line graph below shows the percentage of tourists to England who visited four different attractions in Brighton. 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, second
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1104.0 965.302439024 114% => OK
No of words: 212.0 196.424390244 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.20754716981 4.92477711251 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.81578560438 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.29357356718 2.65546596893 86% => OK
Unique words: 133.0 106.607317073 125% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.627358490566 0.547539520022 115% => OK
syllable_count: 322.2 283.868780488 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.7886244645 43.030603864 118% => OK
Chars per sentence: 138.0 112.824112599 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.5 22.9334400587 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.25 5.23603664747 62% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.284648554094 0.215688989381 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.124514355652 0.103423049105 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.101351681487 0.0843802449381 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.202051961944 0.15604864568 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0979963329647 0.0819641961636 120% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.4 13.2329268293 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 61.2550243902 87% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.3012195122 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.23 11.4140731707 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.87 8.06136585366 110% => OK
difficult_words: 53.0 40.7170731707 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.