A glance at the graph reveals striking comparison between the amount of people visiting three different museums ( in thousands) in 2013.
It is evidence that all three museums witnessed a period of fluctuation with the high from August to July. It is also noticeable that, the number of vistior of British Museum was larger than the others and fluctuated the most widely.
Decreasing to approxiamtely 400000 visitors in July, the number of people visiting Natural History Museum witnessed a slight recovery to about 410000 in August whereas the downward trend continued when it came to Science Museum, dropping to under 300000 visitors. This was follwed by a period of growth until they both reached their peak with over 450000 visitiors in September.
Regarding British Museum, the amount of witnessed an increase period before peaking at over 700000 visitors in July. The following period experienced a downward trend, dropping to the lowest point in August with 500000 visitors.This was followed by a recovery period, bouncing back to somewhere in the vicinity of 500000 visitors.
- The line graph shows the cost for watching films The pie charts show the change in the percentage of market share represented by the three forms 67
- The pie charts below show the comparison of different kinds of energy production of France in two years 100
- The pie charts below show the comparison of different kinds of energy production of France in two years
- The line graph below gives information about the number of visitors to three London museums between June and September 2013 82
- The pie charts below show the comparison of different kinds of energy production of France in two years
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 113, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... people visiting three different museums in thousands in 2013. It is evidence ...
^^
Line 4, column 228, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: This
...st point in August with 500000 visitors.This was followed by a recovery period, boun...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, regarding, so, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 1.0 6.8 15% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 39.0 33.7804878049 115% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 911.0 965.302439024 94% => OK
No of words: 173.0 196.424390244 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.26589595376 4.92477711251 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.62669911048 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66940646895 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 104.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.601156069364 0.547539520022 110% => OK
syllable_count: 265.5 283.868780488 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.919402642 43.030603864 130% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.142857143 112.824112599 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.7142857143 22.9334400587 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.57142857143 5.23603664747 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.164910471119 0.215688989381 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0806249158395 0.103423049105 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0661643499727 0.0843802449381 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.113208085652 0.15604864568 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0581915041586 0.0819641961636 71% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 13.2329268293 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 61.2550243902 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.58 11.4140731707 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.03 8.06136585366 112% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 40.7170731707 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.