The line graph below gives information on cinema attendance in the UK. Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information given.
You should write at least 150 words.
The given line graph illustrates information on the percentage of people who went to the movies in the United Kingdom between 1990 and 2010. The people's attendance is divided into four different age groups.
Overall, younger people seemed to, and are predicted to, be more active in movie going than their older counterparts. However, all four age groups showed a gradual increase in attendance numbers during the given period, except for a slight drop between 1995 and 2000.
To be specific, a larger percentage of people between the ages of 24 and 34 went to, and are expected to, go to the cinema than those in any other age group. Approximately 51% of the respondents from this age group are expected to attend movies in 2010 compared with only 38% in 1990. Even in the group that had the smallest number of movie goers, those between the ages of 44 and 54, there was an increase of 6% in their attendance.
- The pie charts below show electricity generation by source in New Zealand and Germany in 1980 and 2010. 61
- The pie charts below show electricity generation by source in New Zealand and Germany in 1980 and 2010. 67
- The graph below shows average yearly rainfall in Moscow and Sanfrancisco, measured in millimeters 67
- In many schools and universities, girls tend to choose arts subjects (eg. languages) and boys choose science subjects (eg. Physics). What do you think are the reasons? Do you think that this tendency should be changed?To what extent do you agree or disagr 56
- Solar energy is becoming more and more popular as a source of household energy in many countries around the world 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 146, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'peoples'' or 'people's'?
Suggestion: peoples'; people's
...ited Kingdom between 1990 and 2010. The peoples attendance is divided into four differe...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, except for
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 754.0 965.302439024 78% => OK
No of words: 161.0 196.424390244 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.68322981366 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.56210296601 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.51803417825 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 99.0 106.607317073 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.614906832298 0.547539520022 112% => OK
syllable_count: 226.8 283.868780488 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 29.0685326743 43.030603864 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.714285714 112.824112599 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0 22.9334400587 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.28571428571 5.23603664747 63% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0784966895948 0.215688989381 36% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0421617273031 0.103423049105 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0472637842226 0.0843802449381 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0683638796328 0.15604864568 44% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.04727847271 0.0819641961636 58% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.2329268293 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.16 11.4140731707 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.82 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 31.0 40.7170731707 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.