The line graph below shows changes in the amount and type of fast food consumed by Australian teenagers from 1975 to 2000
The graph illustrates how much pizza, humburgers, fish and chips were consumed by teenagers in Australia between 1975 and 2000. Overall, it is obvious that there were upward trends in the amount consumption of all fast food, except with pizza.
In 1975, the figure for pizza eaten was the highest, at 100 times per year, which was 10 times and 5 times higher than that for humburgers and fish and chips. Ten year latter, pizza was still the most popular type of fast food consumed by Australian teenagers, with about 90 times per year. After that, from 1985 to 2000, the amount of pizza witnessed a significant decrease in the number of consumers, and finished at nearly 40 times per year in 2000.
On the other hand, humburgers, fish and chips increased dramatically from 1980 to 2000. In 2000, the amount of hamburgers consumption reached a peak for over 100 times per year, which doubled that of pizza at the same time. Meanwhile, slightly lower than that of humaburgers, the consumption of fish and chips remained stable at approximately 85 times per year during a 5-year period from 1995 to 2000.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-05-17 | Jasmineeee | 56 | view |
- The graph below shows the consumption of fish and some different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 56
- The graph below shows the number of enquiries received by the Tourist Information Office in one city over a six-month period in 2011 84
- The graph below shows the consumption of fish and some different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 73
- Even though globalization affects the world’s economy and society in a positive way, its negative side should be not forgotten. Discuss both sides. You should use your own ideas, knowledge and experience and support your arguments with examples and rele 56
- The line graph below shows changes in the amount and type of fast food cunsumed by Australian teenagers from 1975 yo 2000. 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, still, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 879.0 965.302439024 91% => OK
No of words: 183.0 196.424390244 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.80327868852 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.67800887145 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.50400855136 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 106.0 106.607317073 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.579234972678 0.547539520022 106% => OK
syllable_count: 240.3 283.868780488 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 3.36585365854 238% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 21.6376408141 43.030603864 50% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 109.875 112.824112599 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.875 22.9334400587 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.375 5.23603664747 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.208328354396 0.215688989381 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.106501884809 0.103423049105 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0555494086446 0.0843802449381 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.158853619779 0.15604864568 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0541904105744 0.0819641961636 66% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.2329268293 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 74.53 61.2550243902 122% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.86 11.4140731707 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.83 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.