The line graph illustrates the consumption of fast food by Australia youngsters between 1975 and 2000. There were three types of fast foods, which were pizza, fish and chips, and hamburgers.
In the first glance, it was noticeable fish and chips had shown the most obvious changes among the others. In the beginning, fish and chips were the favorite fast foods, which was 100 number of times eaten per year. However, it had a fluctuation since then. It had suddenly dropped to 82 times eaten in 1980 and increased to around 98 times eaten again in 1985. Furthermore, it had significantly decreased from 1985 to 2000 and left only 39 times eaten in 2000.
Hamburgers and pizza, on the other hand, had rapidly risen since 1975. Hamburgers had
become youngsters favorable fast food in 2000, as it had rapidly surged from 10 times eaten from 1975 and remained constantly to 100 times eaten in 2000. The pizza had almost the same changes as hamburgers, it had become the young one's second choice of fast food since 1990, which was from less than 10 times eaten to approximately 82 times eaten per year.
To sum up, due to the graph, Australian teenagers had a sudden dislike of fish and chips and were more fond of hamburgers.
- The diagrams below show the stages and equipment used in the cement-making process, and how cement is used to produce concrete for building purposes. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where releva 67
- Schools are spending more time teaching traditional subjects such as history Some people think they should rather spend more time in teaching skills that can help students find a job To what extent do you agree or disagree 67
- Many governments think that economic progress is their most important goal. Some people, however, think that other types of progress are equally important for a country. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion. 56
- The graph below shows the proportion of the population aged 65 and over between 1940 and 2040 in three different countries. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The bar chart below gives information about the number of students studying Computer Science at a UK university between 2010 and 2012. 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, however, if, second, then, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1018.0 965.302439024 105% => OK
No of words: 215.0 196.424390244 109% => OK
Chars per words: 4.73488372093 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82921379641 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.46232399996 2.65546596893 93% => OK
Unique words: 108.0 106.607317073 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.502325581395 0.547539520022 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 284.4 283.868780488 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 1.53170731707 326% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 41.8144267089 43.030603864 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.5454545455 112.824112599 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5454545455 22.9334400587 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.81818181818 5.23603664747 130% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.212366289984 0.215688989381 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0926094174883 0.103423049105 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0869566237426 0.0843802449381 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.129933519702 0.15604864568 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0797018897428 0.0819641961636 97% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.6 13.2329268293 80% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 77.57 61.2550243902 127% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 10.3012195122 70% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.15 11.4140731707 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.0 8.06136585366 87% => OK
difficult_words: 33.0 40.7170731707 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 11.4329268293 57% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 11.0658536585 63% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.