The graph below shows the number of enquiries received by the Tourist Information Office in one city over a six-month period in 2011
The line graph illustrates how many enquiries informed to the Tourist Information Office in one city from January to June in 2011. It is obvious that the number of enquiries made in person and by telephone were higher than that of enquiries made by letter/email.
In January, the enquiries by telephone were the highest at approximately 850, which were twice of enquiries by telephone. In March, visitors enquired to the Tourist Information Office by letter/email were as equal as that in person, at about 650. Meanwhile, people called by telephone increased by nearly 1000.
However, beginning from mid-March to June, the numbers of enquiries in person grew rapidly. It became the most popular mean of communication of tourists and reached a peak of 1850 in June. At the same time, the enquiries by telephone were the second position at 1400. In contrast, the people enquired by letter/email were the lowest, at nearly 400 in June.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-17 | kingdangyeu0606 | 78 | view |
| 2019-12-27 | Maleeha | 67 | view |
| 2019-12-18 | lunanguyen0701 | 84 | view |
| 2019-12-15 | KIM JINUK | 56 | view |
| 2019-12-14 | rohitbangari27@gmail.com | 67 | view |
- The line graph below shows changes in the amount and type of fast food consumed by Australian teenagers from 1975 to 2000 78
- The graph below shows the number of enquiries received by the Tourist Information Office in one city over a six-month period in 2011 84
- The graph below shows the consumption of fish and some different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 56
- The line graph below shows changes in the amount and type of fast food cunsumed by Australian teenagers from 1975 yo 2000. 84
- The table below gives information on consumer spending on different items in five different countries in 2002. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 248, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Meanwhile,
... equal as that in person, at about 650. Meanwhile people called by telephone increased by...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, second, so, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 775.0 965.302439024 80% => OK
No of words: 153.0 196.424390244 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.06535947712 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.51700396316 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90131300548 2.65546596893 109% => OK
Unique words: 82.0 106.607317073 77% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.535947712418 0.547539520022 98% => OK
syllable_count: 247.5 283.868780488 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 24.1205818573 43.030603864 56% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 86.1111111111 112.824112599 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.0 22.9334400587 74% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.33333333333 5.23603664747 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.21036921478 0.215688989381 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0909640073189 0.103423049105 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.105940924786 0.0843802449381 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.169961857077 0.15604864568 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.114556933445 0.0819641961636 140% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 13.2329268293 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 61.2550243902 89% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.83 11.4140731707 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.68 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 31.0 40.7170731707 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.