This given line graph below demonstrate 3 different kinds of fast food: Pizza, Fish and chips, Hamburgers in terms of the amount of the times per year for eating of teenagers who lived in Australia between 1975 and 2000.
In general, one of the most notable features of the graph is that the amount of times spent on Fish and Chips selled for Australian teenagers decreased while that on Pizza and Hamburgers increased. As can be seen from the line graph, at the beginning of the period, the Fish and Chips was the best seller in the restaurants, however, at the end, hamburgers became the king of fast food.
In the first year of the period, the figure for Fish and Chips was the highest at 100 times while that for hamburgers and pizza was significantly lower at 10 and 5 respectively. Between 1975 and 1985, there was a huge growth of the consumption of Hamburgers from around 10 to nearly 85 times. By contrast during the same period, the that of Fish and Chips declined slightly from about 100 to more 95 times. This part of the period also witnessed a significant rise of the figure for pizza of nearly 28 times but Pizza just was the least popular fast food.
From 1985 to 2000, the amount of times using for eating Fish and Chips plunged by approximately 50 times while that of Pizza rocketed from nearly 33 to over 85 time. In about 15 last years of the period, the Hamburgers which the figure for went up remarkably from 85 to more 100 times, was the most favorite choice
- The line graph below shows changes in the amount and type of fast food consumed by Australian teenagers from 1975 to 2000. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 78
- The graph below shows the rate of smoking per 1000 people in Someland from 1960 to 2000. 67
- The diagram below shows the process of using water to produce electricity.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 73
- The line graph below shows changes in the amount and type of fast food consumed by Australian teenagers from 1975 to 2000. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 61
- The diagram shows how fruit is canned.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, so, while, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 6.8 176% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 53.0 33.7804878049 157% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1219.0 965.302439024 126% => OK
No of words: 271.0 196.424390244 138% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.49815498155 4.92477711251 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05734859645 3.73543355544 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.40023214792 2.65546596893 90% => OK
Unique words: 127.0 106.607317073 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.468634686347 0.547539520022 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 352.8 283.868780488 124% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 3.36585365854 238% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 30.0 22.4926829268 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 34.286375655 43.030603864 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 135.444444444 112.824112599 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.1111111111 22.9334400587 131% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.77777777778 5.23603664747 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.147683828887 0.215688989381 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0753748418777 0.103423049105 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0609140820356 0.0843802449381 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.122123426901 0.15604864568 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0651896851475 0.0819641961636 80% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 13.2329268293 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 66.41 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.41 11.4140731707 82% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.57 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 17.0 11.4329268293 149% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 10.9970731707 127% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.