The line graph below shows the changes in amount in type of fast food consumed bu Australian teenagers from 1975 to 200.
The given line graph indicates the amount and category of fast food consumed by teenagers in Australia between 1975 and 2000, a period of 25 years.
In general, the consumption of fish and chips showed a sharp downward trend, whereas the amount of Pizza and Hamburgers eaten by Australian teenagers declined considerably over this period.
In 1975, the most popular fast foods consumed were Fish and Chips, with approximately 100 times per year. This was far higher than the other fast foods, Pizza and Hamburgers, with only around 10 times per year. However, apart from a slight increase in the period of 1980 and 1985, the consumption of Pizza and Chips decreased gradually over the 25 year timescales to finish at just below 40 times per year.
In contrast, the amount of Pizza and Hamburgers eaten grew considerably from 1975 to 2000. To be more specific, Pizza consumption witnessed a gradual increase until it overtook the consumption of Fish and Chips in 1990. Then it remained stable at around 85 times per year throughout 1985 to 2000. Specially, the biggest rise was seen in the amount of Hamburgers eaten, exceeding Fish and Chips in 1985. It finished at nearly 100 times per year, the same level that Fish and Chips began.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, then, whereas, apart from, in contrast, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 6.8 176% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1033.0 965.302439024 107% => OK
No of words: 211.0 196.424390244 107% => OK
Chars per words: 4.89573459716 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.81127787577 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55973314572 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 112.0 106.607317073 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.530805687204 0.547539520022 97% => OK
syllable_count: 289.8 283.868780488 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.0519662439 43.030603864 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.3 112.824112599 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.1 22.9334400587 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.3 5.23603664747 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.193648545322 0.215688989381 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.085748705047 0.103423049105 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0965174571099 0.0843802449381 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.153509216095 0.15604864568 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.101285413697 0.0819641961636 124% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.2329268293 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.14 11.4140731707 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.67 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.