The line graph below shows the changes in amount in type of fast food consumed bu Australian teenagers from 1975 to 200.
The given line graph indicates the amount and category of fast food consumed by teenagers in Australia between1975 and 2000, a peridod of 25 years.
In general, the consumption of fish and chips showed a sharply downward trend, whrease the amount of Pizza and Hamburgers eaten by Australian teenagers declined considerably over this period.
In 1975, the most popular fast foods consumed were Fish and Chips, with approximately 100 times per year. This was far higher than the other fast foods, which are Pizza and Hamburgers, with only around 10 times per year. However, apart from a slight increase in the period of 1980 and 1985, the consumption of Pizza and Chips decreased gradually over 25 year timescale to finish at just below 40 times per year.
In contrast, the amount of Pizza and Hamburgers eaten grew considerably from 1975 to 2000. To be more specific, Pizza consumption witnessed a gradual increase until it overtook the consumption of Fish and Chips in 1990. Then it remained stable at around 85 times per year throughout 1985 to 2000. Specially, the biggest rise was seen in the amount of Hamburgers eaten, exceeding Fish and Chips in 1985. It finished at nearly 100 times per year, the same level that Fish and Chips began.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-05-17 | sunflower123 | 73 | view |
- The graph below shows the rate of smoking per 1000 people in Someland from 1960 to 2000. 73
- Foreign language 73
- The graph below shows the rate of smoking per 1000 people in Someland from 1960 to 2000. 61
- The graph below shows the rate of smoking per 1000 people in Someland from 1960 to 2000. 73
- The graph below shows the rate of smoking per 1000 people in Someland from 1960 to 2000. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 359, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'timescale' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'timescales'.
Suggestion: timescales
... Chips decreased gradually over 25 year timescale to finish at just below 40 times per ye...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, then, apart from, in contrast, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 6.8 176% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1038.0 965.302439024 108% => OK
No of words: 211.0 196.424390244 107% => OK
Chars per words: 4.91943127962 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.81127787577 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58829393909 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 115.0 106.607317073 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.545023696682 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 293.4 283.868780488 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.1674609849 43.030603864 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.8 112.824112599 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.1 22.9334400587 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.4 5.23603664747 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.186673323738 0.215688989381 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0816115805421 0.103423049105 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0869074425826 0.0843802449381 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.14323359267 0.15604864568 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0845551719912 0.0819641961636 103% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.2329268293 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.26 11.4140731707 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.82 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.