The line graph below shows the consumption of 4 kinds of meat in European country from 1979 to 2004.
The line graph illustrates the consumed amount of four types of fish and meat (chicken, beef, lamb and fish) in grams by one European person in a week during 25-year period between 1979 and 2004.
Overall, fish was the least consumed kind of meat every year during the time period given. Moreover, the eaten amount of beef and lamb decreased, whereas chicken was the only type of meat which showed increase in grams consumed over the 25 years.
The amount of fish eaten by person each week accounted for 60 grams in 1979, decreased marginally to 50 grams in the following year and remained fixed, showing no significant change till the end of the period. On the other hand, approximately 140 grams of chicken were consumed in the first year which fluctuated but overall increased to 250 grams in the last year, becoming by far the most consumed type of meat.
In regard to lamb and beef, the consumption began at 150 grams and just over 200 grams, respectively, with beef being the most consumed meat in the beginning of the period. The amount eaten fluctuated and gradually decreased for beef, hitting the low of 100 grams in about 2000. Likewise, lamb consumption dropped to a low of approximately 50 grams in the last years.
- The bar chart below shows the hours per week that teenagers spend doing certain activities in Chester from 2002 to 2007 93
- The line graph below shows the consumption of 4 kinds of meat in European country from 1979 to 2004 73
- The table below gives information about the underground railway systems in 6 countries 56
- The chart below shows the global sales of different kinds of digital games from 2000 to 2006 73
- The table shows the proportion of income spent on 4 common items in the UK in 1998 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 415, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... by far the most consumed type of meat. In regard to lamb and beef, the consumpt...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, likewise, moreover, so, whereas, kind of, in regard to, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 0.0 5.60731707317 0% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 33.7804878049 115% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1016.0 965.302439024 105% => OK
No of words: 215.0 196.424390244 109% => OK
Chars per words: 4.72558139535 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82921379641 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.470402406 2.65546596893 93% => OK
Unique words: 108.0 106.607317073 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.502325581395 0.547539520022 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 288.9 283.868780488 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.5511238038 43.030603864 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.0 112.824112599 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.875 22.9334400587 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.125 5.23603664747 212% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.147468452635 0.215688989381 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0704624154877 0.103423049105 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0571939391804 0.0843802449381 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.106494147704 0.15604864568 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0605029246561 0.0819641961636 74% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.2329268293 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 70.47 61.2550243902 115% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.45 11.4140731707 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.28 8.06136585366 90% => OK
difficult_words: 32.0 40.7170731707 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.