The line graph below shows the household recycling rates in three different countries between 2005 and 2015.
The given line graph compares the rate of recycling trends in three different countries (the UK, Iraq, and Germany) over a period of 15 years from 2005 to 2015).
Looking from the overall perspective, it is readily apparent that the UK and Germany rose significantly at the same pace over the given period, while Iraq showed a reverse scenario in the growth rate.
According to the given illustration, Germany started with the least recycling rate(20%), while the rate of the UK was higher by 18% at the start of the period. A steady growth jumped the graph for the former country to 58% as against 45% for the latter in 2011. By the end of the period, both the countries observed a dramatic growth rate leading to 60% and 58% respectively.
On the other hand, Iraq's growth rate witnessed a contrasting trend. With 50% recycling rates, Iraq led the trend in 2005. Thereafter, the rate plummeted sharply until 2013. From here onwards, a sudden rise climbed the value to 40% in 2015, which was still half as compared to the other two countries.
- Some people say that advertising is extremely successful at persuading us to buy things Other people think that advertising is so common that we no longer pay attention to it Discuss both these views and give your opinion 89
- The two maps below show the changes in the town of Denham from 1986 to the present day 73
- The Graph below shows average carbon dioxide CO2 emissions per person in the United Kindom Sweden Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- Should wealthy nations be required to share their wealth among poorer nations by providing such things as food and education Or is it the responsibility of the governments of poorer nations to look after their citizens themselves You should write at least 78
- The column graph shows the rate of consumers in three age groups taking healthy food between 2011 and 2016 72
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 137, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...icantly at the same pace over the given period of time, while Iraq showed a reverse scenario i...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, look, still, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 878.0 965.302439024 91% => OK
No of words: 185.0 196.424390244 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.74594594595 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.68801715136 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.50268519053 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 110.0 106.607317073 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.594594594595 0.547539520022 109% => OK
syllable_count: 251.1 283.868780488 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.5292972101 43.030603864 117% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.5555555556 112.824112599 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5555555556 22.9334400587 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.55555555556 5.23603664747 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.26123816897 0.215688989381 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.105298868728 0.103423049105 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.10438772397 0.0843802449381 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.174531454115 0.15604864568 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.129659307793 0.0819641961636 158% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 13.2329268293 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 61.2550243902 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.27 11.4140731707 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.21 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.