The line graph below shows the number of annual visits to Australia by overseas residents The table below gives information on the country of origin where the visitors came from

The line graph depict the information about the count of visitors who visit in Australia from international from 1975 to 2005 and tabular chart illustrate the information about the number of tourist from six different countries in 1975 and 2005. The data is calibrated in millions.

It can be clearly seen that 10 million people visit in Australia in 1975 and after one decade, the count of visitors was just above 15. Afterthat, the number of tourists was increased rapidly and in 2005, the number of visitors was double from 1985. Moving to the remaining to illustration, the total number of visitors from the overseas house was highest in 2005 as compared to 1975.

Moving further, in 1975, the highest number of people visits from Japan which was 3.2 million which followed South Korea with 2.9 million and the count of tourists from China and the USA almost the same which was 0.3 million and 0.4 million whereas, in Britain and Europe the count of visitors was more than USA, it was 0.9 and 1.1 million. However, in 2005, the count of tourists from China, USA and Britain was 0.8, 1.1 and 2.9 million respectively. In contrast, the count of visitors was 12 million from Japan and in South Korea, the count of visitors declined by approximately 3 million. Lastly,the count of visitors was half of South Korea which was 4.5 million.

Hence, it can be analyzed that the number of visitors inclined in every decade and the count of visitors was maximum from Japan.

Votes
Average: 6.7 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 599, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , the
...lined by approximately 3 million. Lastly,the count of visitors was half of South Kor...
^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
hence, however, if, lastly, so, whereas, in contrast

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 7.0 229% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 6.8 191% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 33.7804878049 145% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1221.0 965.302439024 126% => OK
No of words: 255.0 196.424390244 130% => OK
Chars per words: 4.78823529412 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.99608801488 3.73543355544 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.45980841519 2.65546596893 93% => OK
Unique words: 112.0 106.607317073 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.439215686275 0.547539520022 80% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 346.5 283.868780488 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 11.0 4.33902439024 254% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 82.3519277249 43.030603864 191% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.1 112.824112599 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.5 22.9334400587 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.2 5.23603664747 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.173372309875 0.215688989381 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0909572685871 0.103423049105 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0682672032312 0.0843802449381 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.147874841605 0.15604864568 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.064751944564 0.0819641961636 79% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.2329268293 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 63.02 61.2550243902 103% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.8 11.4140731707 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.91 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 40.7170731707 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.