the line graph below shows the number of annual visits to Australia by overseas residents. The table below gives information on the country of origin where the visitors came from
In the first part the table shows data about the tourism of foreign country visit to Australia and the second part the line graph illustrates caller to Australia by overseas residents between 1975 to 2005.
In firstly ,the table compares the number of people from south Korea ,japan, China, USA, Britain, Europe are visit Australia the noticeable thing can be seen from japan the foreign people came to japan is the highest visitor TEMPthan the other country ,it is 3.2million in 1975 and 12 million in 2005.a few number of people from china visit the overseas of Australia (eg.3.2 in 1975 and 0.8 in 2005)
In second part, the line graph gives information the total number of visitors from 1975 to 20, the few numbers of people approximately 10 million tourism visit Australia in 1975 and the highest amount of people visit Australia in 2005
In overall the line graph illustrates the number of tourists dat visit Australia growing from 10 to 30 million during 1975 to 2005.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-11-13 | pritam | 84 | view |
| 2019-09-26 | krunalptl29 | 73 | view |
| 2019-08-13 | abhushek_saha | 67 | view |
| 2019-08-10 | ravitejacts | 84 | view |
| 2019-08-10 | ravitejacts | 78 | view |
- The two maps below the area of baton bigham in 1937 to 1995 56
- the line graph below shows the number of annual visits to Australia by overseas residents. The table below gives information on the country of origin where the visitors came from 56
- people living in large cities today face many problems in their everyday life. What are these problems? Should government encourage people to move to smaller regional towns? 78
- The two maps below the area of Baton Bingham in 1937 to 1995 85
- Some say that the internet is making the world smaller by bringing peopletogether. To what extent do to you agree that the internet is making it easier forpeople to communicate with one another. 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 11, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...idents between 1975 to 2005. In firstly ,the table compares the number of people ...
^^
Line 2, column 69, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...es the number of people from south Korea ,japan, China, USA, Britain, Europe are v...
^^
Line 2, column 115, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...n, China, USA, Britain, Europe are visit Australia the noticeable thing can be s...
^^
Line 2, column 126, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...SA, Britain, Europe are visit Australia the noticeable thing can be seen from ja...
^^
Line 2, column 254, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...ghest visitor TEMPthan the other country ,it is 3.2million in 1975 and 12 million...
^^
Line 2, column 272, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...than the other country ,it is 3.2million in 1975 and 12 million in 2005.a few num...
^^
Line 2, column 307, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun number seems to be countable; consider using: 'few numbers'.
Suggestion: few numbers
...llion in 1975 and 12 million in 2005.a few number of people from china visit the overseas...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 401, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...Australia eg.3.2 in 1975 and 0.8 in 2005 In second part, the line graph gives inf...
^^^
Line 3, column 235, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...amount of people visit Australia in 2005 In overall the line graph illustrates th...
^^^
Line 4, column 133, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...m 10 to 30 million during 1975 to 2005.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, second, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 811.0 965.302439024 84% => OK
No of words: 168.0 196.424390244 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.82738095238 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.60020574368 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.35388633874 2.65546596893 89% => OK
Unique words: 79.0 106.607317073 74% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.470238095238 0.547539520022 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 231.3 283.868780488 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 2.0 8.94146341463 22% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 84.0 22.4926829268 373% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 283.0 43.030603864 658% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 405.5 112.824112599 359% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 84.0 22.9334400587 366% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 13.0 5.23603664747 248% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 10.0 1.69756097561 589% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.325456007455 0.215688989381 151% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.262883486775 0.103423049105 254% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0319682824496 0.0843802449381 38% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.22334705092 0.15604864568 143% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0306653151726 0.0819641961636 37% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 43.3 13.2329268293 327% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: 3.14 61.2550243902 5% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 0.0 6.51609756098 0% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 33.7 10.3012195122 327% => Flesch kincaid grade is high.
coleman_liau_index: 11.92 11.4140731707 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.53 8.06136585366 131% => OK
difficult_words: 29.0 40.7170731707 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 26.5 11.4329268293 232% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 35.6 10.9970731707 324% => Gunning_fog is high.
text_standard: 27.0 11.0658536585 244% => The average readability is very high. Good job!
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.