The line graph below shows the number of books borrowed from 4 village libraries.
The line graph shows the changes in the number of books which was borrowed from 4 village libraries from June to September.
It is obvious that there was a downward trend in the number of books borrowed from Ryeslip, while there was an opposite trend in that of the other libraries. However, the number of books borrowed from Sutton Wood experienced a wild fluctuation in comparison with the gradual change in the other libraries.
The figures in West Eaton and Church Mount followed the similar pattern when the number of book borrowed started at 50, climbed steadily from June to September and finished at 150. On the contrary, the number of borrowed books from Sutton Wood climbs slightly, fell twofold and hit a low of 100 in August, which followed by a surge at 300 in the last month of the period.
Compared to three other libraries, Ryeslip had the highest number of book borrowed in June. Suddenly, a sharp decline was seen in the number of books borrowed for the next 4 month until it reached the lowest point of merely 170 in September.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-09-26 | amynguyen97 | 73 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 181, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... other libraries. However, the number of books borrowed from Sutton Wood experien...
^^
Line 5, column 212, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...d at 150. On the contrary, the number of borrowed books from Sutton Wood climbs s...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, so, while, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 33.7804878049 115% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 871.0 965.302439024 90% => OK
No of words: 185.0 196.424390244 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.70810810811 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.68801715136 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.41443189452 2.65546596893 91% => OK
Unique words: 97.0 106.607317073 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.524324324324 0.547539520022 96% => OK
syllable_count: 253.8 283.868780488 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.2311984256 43.030603864 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.428571429 112.824112599 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.4285714286 22.9334400587 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 5.23603664747 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.474100994521 0.215688989381 220% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.240925142578 0.103423049105 233% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.131576445339 0.0843802449381 156% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.317058066412 0.15604864568 203% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.136872972362 0.0819641961636 167% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.2329268293 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 62.01 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.33 11.4140731707 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.17 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.