the line graph below shows the oil production and consumption in china between 1982 and 2006
The data source illustrates how much oil was produced and consumed in China in the 24-year period from 1982 to 2006.
It is evident that both the production and consumption of oil increased during the period shown. Moreover, in the first half of the period,the amount of oil used was lower than produced, the opposite was true for the second one.
As can be seen from the graph, in 1982 there was no significant divergence in Chinese oil consumption and production, which both stood at 2 million barrels everyday. During the next 12 years, the number of oil barrels manufactured daily witnessed a dramatic increase of 1 million in the first 4 years and then reached a plateau for the next 8 years, while that used by people experienced the reverse phenomenon.
Looking at the graph in more details, not until the year of 1990 did the consumption and production of oil remain relatively equal at 3 million barrels. Since then, the gap between consumption and production was widen gradually because the pace of the former was more rapid than the latter. In the last year of the period,the production of this kind of fuel rose marginally, just below 3.5 million, whereas the amount in demand doubled that.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 41, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...The data source illustrates how much oil was produced and consumed in China in th...
^^
Line 3, column 139, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , the
...oreover, in the first half of the period,the amount of oil used was lower than produ...
^^^^
Line 5, column 157, Rule ID: EVERYDAY_EVERY_DAY[3]
Message: 'Everyday' is an adjective. Did you mean 'every day'?
Suggestion: every day
..., which both stood at 2 million barrels everyday. During the next 12 years, the number o...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 280, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...tnessed a dramatic increase of 1 million in the first 4 years and then reached a ...
^^
Line 5, column 344, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nd then reached a plateau for the next 8 years, while that used by people experie...
^^
Line 9, column 213, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'widened'.
Suggestion: widened
... between consumption and production was widen gradually because the pace of the forme...
^^^^^
Line 9, column 322, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , the
...e latter. In the last year of the period,the production of this kind of fuel rose ma...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, look, moreover, second, so, then, whereas, while, kind of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 3.97073170732 252% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1008.0 965.302439024 104% => OK
No of words: 208.0 196.424390244 106% => OK
Chars per words: 4.84615384615 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.79765784423 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6628887193 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 124.0 106.607317073 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.596153846154 0.547539520022 109% => OK
syllable_count: 291.6 283.868780488 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.0860353918 43.030603864 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.0 112.824112599 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.0 22.9334400587 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.5 5.23603664747 162% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 1.69756097561 412% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.267450951106 0.215688989381 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.116455368176 0.103423049105 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.058222254466 0.0843802449381 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.154235825668 0.15604864568 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0382519327562 0.0819641961636 47% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.2329268293 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 62.01 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.15 11.4140731707 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.34 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.