The given line graph illustrates the petroleum extraction and using up in China from 1982 to 2006.
In general, there was significantly increase in oil consumption whereas there was a tedious growth of oil production in 24 years.
In 1982, the petroleum produced and consumed was almost the same, both contributed around 2 millions of oil barrels per day. However, the figure of oil consumption almost remained plateau in the next 8 years. By contrast, that of oil production rose continuously to 3 millions oil barrels per day in 1986 and unchanged in the next 8 years.
Since 1994, the oil used up overtook the petroleum produced and soar swiftly in the next 12 years, reached over 6 millions of oil barrels per day in 2006. On the other other, the figure of oil extraction rose slowly, only yielding around 3.5 millions of oil. barrels per day in 2006. When comparing with the oil produced in the same year, the oil production took only half of the oil consumption in 2006.
- the line graph below shows the oil production and consumption in china between 1982 and 2006 67
- The government spends about 220 million pounds a year supporting museums and art galleries in the UK and a similar amount subsidising the visual and performing arts This is a huge sum to spend on minority interests and the money would be better spent on m 85
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 91, Rule ID: CD_DOZENS_OF[1]
Message: Use a singular form of the numeral here: '2 million'.
Suggestion: 2 million
...lmost the same, both contributed around 2 millions of oil barrels per day. However, the figur...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 113, Rule ID: CD_DOZENS_OF[1]
Message: Use a singular form of the numeral here: '6 million'.
Suggestion: 6 million
...ftly in the next 12 years, reached over 6 millions of oil barrels per day in 2006. On the oth...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 163, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: other
... of oil barrels per day in 2006. On the other other, the figure of oil extraction rose slow...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 241, Rule ID: CD_DOZENS_OF[1]
Message: Use a singular form of the numeral here: '5 million'.
Suggestion: 5 million
...ion rose slowly, only yielding around 3.5 millions of oil. barrels per day in 2006. When comp...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 260, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Barrels
...ly yielding around 3.5 millions of oil. barrels per day in 2006. When comparing with th...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, so, whereas, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 815.0 965.302439024 84% => OK
No of words: 171.0 196.424390244 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.76608187135 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.61617157096 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67999643722 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 85.0 106.607317073 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.497076023392 0.547539520022 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 227.7 283.868780488 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 35.3420674041 43.030603864 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.5555555556 112.824112599 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0 22.9334400587 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.55555555556 5.23603664747 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 1.69756097561 295% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.309093603639 0.215688989381 143% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.145790724537 0.103423049105 141% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0716526494165 0.0843802449381 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.207429699745 0.15604864568 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.048152922657 0.0819641961636 59% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.5 13.2329268293 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 77.57 61.2550243902 127% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 10.3012195122 70% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.39 11.4140731707 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.35 8.06136585366 91% => OK
difficult_words: 30.0 40.7170731707 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.