The line chart illustrates how much oil was produced and consumed in China from 1982 to 2006.
Overall, it can be seen that there was an upward trend in both the production and consumption of oil during the given period. In addition, oil consumption climbed significantly faster compared to its production over 24 years.
At the beginning of the period, the figures for both oil production and consumption were nearly equal, at around 2 million barrels per day. After 8 years, the amount of oil produced rose significantly by 1 million and remained unchanged until 1994. Meanwhile, that of oil consumed witnessed a stability until 1990, after which it climbed remarkably to 3 million in 1994.
In the second half of the period, the figure for oil production increased slightly to 3.5 million barrels per day. By contrast, the amount of oil consumed grew steadily by 1 million every 4 years, and finally reached a peak of 6 million at the end of the period.
- The bar chart shows the percentage of the total world population in four countries in 1950 and 2002 and projections for 2050 73
- The graph below shows the changes in food consumption by Chinese people between 1985 and 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 38
- Fewer students are studying science at school and university favoring more computer based subjects instead Is this a positive or negative development What are the reasons for this 67
- Most high level jobs are done by men Should governments encourage that a certain percentage of these jobs be reserved for women What is your opinion 55
- Wild animals have no place in the 21st century so protecting them is a waste of resources To what extent do you agree or disagree 56
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, if, second, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 801.0 965.302439024 83% => OK
No of words: 165.0 196.424390244 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.85454545455 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.58402463422 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76136270108 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 92.0 106.607317073 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.557575757576 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 231.3 283.868780488 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 17.4696164812 43.030603864 41% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 100.125 112.824112599 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.625 22.9334400587 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.875 5.23603664747 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.231887200353 0.215688989381 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.110869177299 0.103423049105 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0715984372088 0.0843802449381 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.160948345856 0.15604864568 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0733029762772 0.0819641961636 89% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 13.2329268293 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 61.2550243902 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.85 11.4140731707 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.4 8.06136585366 92% => OK
difficult_words: 29.0 40.7170731707 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.