The line graph below shows the percentage of tourists to England who visited four different attractions in Brighton. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The graph demonstrates the interests of tourists in four different destinations in Brighton, England. In general, Pavilion and Pier shows the increase in the number of visitors while fewer people choose Art Gallery and Festival as their tours’ destinations.
In 1980, Pier was the least visited attraction with only 10% of visitors. The figure started to increase to about 15% in the next five years but then quickly fell to less than 10% in the year of 1990. Despite of some fluctuations, the proportion of visitors to Pier gradually rose to around 21% within 20-year period, which was higher than that of Art Gallery. Pavilion, started with about 24%, sharply climbed to the highest point of the whole graph in 1995 with nearly 48% of visiting tourists. However, it then drastically decreased to nearly 31% the next 15 years but still remained the most attracted destination.
Festival was the most visited attraction in 1980, then it slowly fell to 28% in 1985. By contrast, number of people came to Art Gallery rose tremendously to its highest proportion, about 38%, within the same period. However, in the next 25-year period, both graphs showed the decrease in the proportion of tourist. While slight increase from 1995 to 2010 helped Festival reach 28% of visitors, Art Gallery dropped to 8%, the lowest percentage of tourists despite a small increase in 1995.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-31 | maiphuonganh | 56 | view |
| 2023-08-31 | maiphuonganh | 11 | view |
| 2023-08-31 | maiphuonganh | 11 | view |
| 2023-06-19 | ililmaidatuz | 78 | view |
| 2023-06-19 | ililmaidatuz | 78 | view |
- The line graph below shows the percentage of tourists to England who visited four different attractions in Brighton Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 87
- The charts below give information about USA marriage and divorce rates between 1970 and 2000 and the marital status of adult Americans in two of the years Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where re 78
- The chart below gives information about oil production capacity Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 11
- The line graph below shows the percentage of tourists to England who visited four different attractions in Brighton Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The chart below shows the percentage of difference in income between men and women from 1978 to 2008 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, so, still, then, while, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 33.7804878049 151% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1150.0 965.302439024 119% => OK
No of words: 228.0 196.424390244 116% => OK
Chars per words: 5.04385964912 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.88582923847 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64243375326 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 125.0 106.607317073 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.548245614035 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 318.6 283.868780488 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.4459960863 43.030603864 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.545454545 112.824112599 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.7272727273 22.9334400587 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.72727272727 5.23603664747 90% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 3.70975609756 216% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.127765015666 0.215688989381 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0611408859233 0.103423049105 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0752461443902 0.0843802449381 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.104685234605 0.15604864568 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0486730744481 0.0819641961636 59% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.2329268293 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 61.2550243902 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.95 11.4140731707 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.23 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 40.7170731707 128% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.