The line graph illustrates the tourist proportion, which was recorded in four appealing locations in Brighton, United Kingdom in three decades beginning in 1980. Looking from an overall perspective, it is readily apparent that the rate of tourism in an art gallery and a pavilion experienced a fluctuating trend, with the pavilions reaching a peak ( nearly 50%) in 1995. Meanwhile, For the same purpose in Pier and a festival, it is mostly unaltered in the whole period. The percentage of art galleries and pavilions's tourism follows the same trend, which prior to surging to a high point before considerably dropping to finish the period. The former, which had started in the third ( just over 20%), rapidly rocketed to approximately 48% and fell to under its starting precisely 20%. After the golden age, the figure plunged to just under 10% in 2010. In terms of the beginning, the latter is even more substantial concerning when compared to the art gallery. The moderate growth in the first five years prepared for an overtaking jump to reach a peak ( just under 50%) throughout the time surveyed period and dropped steadily to the plateau of over 30%, but it is still the most prevalent location for visitors in the last year. Despite starting with the highest points, Remaining stable in the number of tourists was a major aim, so this divergence between the start and end point was just a gradual drop. From 1980 to 2000, there was a fluctuation in the proportion of tourists in Pier and it rose to over 20% in the rest of the period.
- The diagram below shows the development of a particular area between 1965 and the present day 11
- The graph and table give information about water use worldwide and water consumption in two different countries Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The diagram below shows the development of a particular area between 1965 and the present day 11
- The chart shows the division of household tasks by gender in Great Britain 61
- Some people believe that technology has made man more social To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 348, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rend, with the pavilions reaching a peak nearly 50% in 1995. Meanwhile, For the s...
^^
Line 1, column 681, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e former, which had started in the third just over 20%, rapidly rocketed to appro...
^^
Line 1, column 1049, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...d for an overtaking jump to reach a peak just under 50% throughout the time surve...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, look, so, still, third, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 51.0 33.7804878049 151% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1267.0 965.302439024 131% => OK
No of words: 265.0 196.424390244 135% => OK
Chars per words: 4.78113207547 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03470204552 3.73543355544 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65593366334 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 155.0 106.607317073 145% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.584905660377 0.547539520022 107% => OK
syllable_count: 375.3 283.868780488 132% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.4981651067 43.030603864 127% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.7 112.824112599 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.5 22.9334400587 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.1 5.23603664747 78% => OK
Paragraphs: 1.0 3.83414634146 26% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0464146905314 0.215688989381 22% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0196226906073 0.103423049105 19% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0373310332062 0.0843802449381 44% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0464146905314 0.15604864568 30% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0819641961636 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.2329268293 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 62.01 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.74 11.4140731707 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.92 8.06136585366 111% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 40.7170731707 165% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum two paragraphs wanted.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.