The line graph below shows the percentage of tourists to England who visited four different attractions in Brighton.
The line chart indicates the number of people came to England to visit four separate attractions in Brighton from 1980 to 2010. Overall, it is clear that the percentage of people visiting pavilion and pier increased over the period, while the figure for other attractions fell.
In 1980, The festival was the most favourite place with 30% of people preferred to visit. However, by 2010, this figure had fallen to below, at just over 25%. Standing at a lower number, at above 20%, the number of tourists to art gallery fell to just under 10% in 2010. It was, therefore, the least popular of the attractions at the end of the period of 30 years.
There was a remarkable change in the pavilion during the 3 decades. In 1980, that place experienced nearly 25% of people went sightseeing. By 2010, this figure had only risen to 30%, despite a sharp increase and a peak of 50% in 1995. The pier which was least popular attraction saw a minor fluctuating growth in the number of visitors. This figure rose from 10% in 1980 to just over 20% in 2010.
- Some people believe famous people's support towards international aid organisations draws attention to problems. Others think celebrities make the problems less important. Discuss both views and give your opinion. 73
- The maps below show the village of Stokeford in 1930 and 2010.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant 78
- It is impossible to help all people in the world, so governments should only focus on people in their own countries. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 76
- The chart shows the number of mobile phones and landlines per 100 people in selected countries Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information given 70
- The chart below shows the percentage change in the share of international students among university graduates in different Canadian provinces between 2001 and 2006 72
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 187, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...st over 25%. Standing at a lower number, at above 20%, the number of tourists to ...
^^
Line 5, column 251, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[3]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'was the least'.
Suggestion: was the least
...d a peak of 50% in 1995. The pier which was least popular attraction saw a minor fluctuat...
^^^^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['however', 'therefore', 'while']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.226244343891 0.268076937826 84% => OK
Verbs: 0.122171945701 0.116061578633 105% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0497737556561 0.0759168565197 66% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0407239819005 0.0366838410393 111% => OK
Pronouns: 0.00904977375566 0.0131127313244 69% => OK
Prepositions: 0.16742081448 0.155750635184 107% => OK
Participles: 0.0316742081448 0.0379272487307 84% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.44602207528 2.65546596893 92% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0407239819005 0.0210936926555 193% => Less infinitives wanted.
Particles: 0.0 0.00175180941692 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.113122171946 0.0948980150116 119% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0 0.00437022459523 0% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.00452488687783 0.00967000014798 47% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1046.0 1161.00487805 90% => OK
No of words: 188.0 196.9 95% => OK
Chars per words: 5.56382978723 5.90752243213 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.70287850203 3.73763899035 99% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.287234042553 0.337110787985 85% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.18085106383 0.247514529752 73% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.143617021277 0.171178102325 84% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.0797872340426 0.112407865282 71% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.44602207528 2.65546596893 92% => OK
Unique words: 106.0 106.607317073 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.563829787234 0.546246751206 103% => OK
Word variations: 50.4266449992 49.3433353143 102% => OK
How many sentences: 11.0 8.93414634146 123% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0909090909 23.0094962315 74% => OK
Sentence length SD: 26.4893554171 42.9750493124 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.0909090909 135.714022679 70% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.0909090909 23.0094962315 74% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.272727272727 0.689975730869 40% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.84146341463 78% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.48048780488 135% => OK
Readability: 35.1760154739 47.7609492067 74% => OK
Elegance: 2.47368421053 2.94281807926 84% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.426441272202 0.418131533498 102% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.115321588274 0.181151798455 64% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0820899768738 0.0850326197045 97% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.556838595241 0.706616315825 79% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.118644814731 0.157042692854 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.189009709296 0.228904883108 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.10339269549 0.108899403657 95% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.509926898273 0.367819155151 139% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.00925361136737 0.0812612215331 11% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.33543874185 0.316326947829 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.076462022072 0.0921553760075 83% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70731707317 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.14146341463 263% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.08536585366 49% => OK
Positive topic words: 6.0 3.16585365854 190% => OK
Negative topic words: 3.0 0.956097560976 314% => OK
Neutral topic words: 2.0 3.02926829268 66% => OK
Total topic words: 11.0 7.1512195122 154% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.