The map below is of the town of Garlsdon. A new supermarket (S) is planned for the town. The map shows two possible sites for the supermarket.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The map shows the plan to build a new supermarket in Garlsdon. Overall, it is clear that two sites possible to install the supermarket are outside of the town in the countryside (S1) and inside the city centre.
Looking at the site S1, since locating nearby the main road, the site is a potential benefit for the supermarket to reach further customers as residents in other areas can travel by train. Moreover, installing at this location could enable the supermarket to have the extension of space for parking. Also, citizens in both areas Hindon and Bransdon could commute by car within short distances 12km (to the north-east) and 16km (to the south-east) respectively.
Turning to the site S2, it is a considerable concern for shoppers parking car as well as driving since the city centre has no traffic zone. This site may be convenient for local residents only. However, people living in Cransdon (25km - to the south-west) and Hindon can go shopping by train.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-30 | morbymuku | 67 | view |
| 2019-12-06 | habeeb omran | 84 | view |
| 2019-08-18 | andrew123 | 78 | view |
| 2019-08-16 | mirandajose | 78 | view |
| 2019-08-13 | David Shahi | 84 | view |
- The line graph below shows the changes in the share price of Outokumpu companies in euros between January 2006 and December 2010 70
- Nowadays more and more young people hold the important positions in the government. Some people think that it is a good thing,while others argue that it is not suitable.Discuss both these views and give your opinion.Give reasons for your answer and includ 34
- The line graph below gives information about the number of visitors to three London museums between June and September 2013 75
- The table below gives information about Favorite Pastimes in different countries. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 11
- The chart below shows the percentage change in the share of international students among university graduates in different Canadian provinces between 2001 and 2006 72
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, look, may, moreover, so, well, in short, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 1.00243902439 499% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 33.7804878049 74% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalization wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 800.0 965.302439024 83% => OK
No of words: 164.0 196.424390244 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.87804878049 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.57858190836 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71516504326 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 105.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.640243902439 0.547539520022 117% => OK
syllable_count: 239.4 283.868780488 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.9031248888 43.030603864 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.0 112.824112599 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5 22.9334400587 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.25 5.23603664747 158% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.274350234615 0.215688989381 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.123372728591 0.103423049105 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.115200332846 0.0843802449381 137% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.197359574264 0.15604864568 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.12730676435 0.0819641961636 155% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 13.2329268293 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 61.2550243902 97% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.02 11.4140731707 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.77 8.06136585366 109% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.