The line graph below shows the percentage of tourists to England who visited four different attractions in Brighton. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The graph above indicates the proportion of the visitors coming to Art Gallery, Pavilion, Pier and Festival in Brighton, England in a period of 30 years from 1980 to 2010.
Overall, the percentage of the tourist varied between four attractions very much. Most of the changes from 1980 to 2010 fluctuated dramatically, especially was Pavillion.
It's easy to see that the percentage of Pavillion had many variations. For example, the people visit this destination increased gradually from 1980 to 1985 and peaked at 49% at the end of this period. Throughout the remainder of the period, the number of tourists of this place had decreased rapidly by the year 2000 and continue from that time to 2010. In the same way, the visitors coming to Art Gallery increased to 37% in 1985 but there was a stable decline between 1990 and 2010 and dropped to below 10%.
The trend of Festiva wasn’t like Pavillion and Art Gallery. Although it started higher than both of above destinations, there weren't any clear changes in all the time referred, it always stayed below 30%. The Pier is the only place had a positive outlook when the percentage of visitors increase from 1980 to 2010 and it isn't likely to stop this achievement.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-08-08 | bloomingme | 56 | view |
| 2018-08-07 | bloomingme | 78 | view |
- The bar chart shows the scores of teams A, B and C over four different seasons. 78
- The graph shows the amount of money spent on books in Germany, France, Italy and Austria between 1995 and 2005. 73
- The graph below shows the average time spent by four car manufacturers to produce vehicles at their US factories 77
- The chart below shows the amount of leisure time enjoyed by men and women of different employment status. 73
- The following bar chart shows the different modes of transport used to travel to and from work in one European city in 1960, 1980 and 2000. 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 80, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...n of the visitors coming to Art Gallery, Pavilion, Pier and Festival in Brighton,...
^^
Line 7, column 132, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: weren't
... than both of above destinations, there werent any clear changes in all the time refer...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 327, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: isn't
...itors increase from 1980 to 2010 and it isnt likely to stop this achievement.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, look, for example, in the same way
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 5.60731707317 178% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 44.0 33.7804878049 130% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1021.0 965.302439024 106% => OK
No of words: 209.0 196.424390244 106% => OK
Chars per words: 4.88516746411 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.80221413058 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65305719571 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 119.0 106.607317073 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.569377990431 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 295.2 283.868780488 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.6989663945 43.030603864 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.1 112.824112599 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.9 22.9334400587 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.9 5.23603664747 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 3.70975609756 216% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0932117120228 0.215688989381 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.041041293684 0.103423049105 40% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0466577027655 0.0843802449381 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0668532158711 0.15604864568 43% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0284203693078 0.0819641961636 35% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.2329268293 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 61.2550243902 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.08 11.4140731707 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.33 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 40.7170731707 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.