The following bar chart shows the different modes of transport used to travel to and from work in one European city in 1960, 1980 and 2000.
The bar chart illustrates the percentage of four ways that people in a European city used to go to work in three different years.
Overall, there was plenty of significant variations in 1960, 1980 and 2002. The travellers who went by bike and by foot decreased continually while the percentage of people chose the car to go to work increase rapidly.
The percentage of people using the bus in 1960 was nearly 20% and then increased to 23% in 1980. In a similar way, the traveller using car grew from 5% to about 23%. By contrast, there was a slight reduction in the number of passengers using the bike and the people walking. In detail, the percentage went down from 25% to 20% in terms of people using the bike and from nearly 30% to above 20% with people went by foot.
In 2002, there was a small difference in comparison with the year 1980 when the people went to work by bus decline to 17%. The rest of transport modes didn’t appear any fluctuation when the passengers using car reach a peak at above 40% while the percentage with people using the bike and walking decreased to nearly 5% and 10% sequentially.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-03 | quynhthi2001 | 78 | view |
| 2019-08-21 | Sai sushma | 67 | view |
| 2019-07-30 | Omfiann | 73 | view |
| 2019-06-11 | Mishika sugandhi | 78 | view |
| 2019-05-13 | Raksha rai | 73 | view |
- The chart shows the division of household tasks by gender in Great Britain 11
- Government spend millions of dollars each year on their space programmes Most recently Mars is the focus of scientists attention Some people think this money would be better spent on dealing with problems closer to home Do you agree or disagree 58
- The chart below shows the amount of leisure time enjoyed by men and women of different employment status. 73
- The graph shows the amount of money spent on books in Germany, France, Italy and Austria between 1995 and 2005. 73
- The line graph below shows the percentage of tourists to England who visited four different attractions in Brighton. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 98, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "In a similar way" with adverb for "similar"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
... 20% and then increased to 23% in 1980. In a similar way, the traveller using car growth from 5%...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, then, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 33.7804878049 130% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 937.0 965.302439024 97% => OK
No of words: 203.0 196.424390244 103% => OK
Chars per words: 4.6157635468 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.77462671648 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62453882294 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 97.0 106.607317073 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.477832512315 0.547539520022 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 270.9 283.868780488 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.3095587951 43.030603864 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.111111111 112.824112599 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5555555556 22.9334400587 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.11111111111 5.23603664747 40% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.246470874403 0.215688989381 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.113663248843 0.103423049105 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0661497364727 0.0843802449381 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.169310844077 0.15604864568 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0670262412418 0.0819641961636 82% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 13.2329268293 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 74.53 61.2550243902 122% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.81 11.4140731707 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.98 8.06136585366 87% => OK
difficult_words: 29.0 40.7170731707 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.