The given linear graph highlight the information about the tourists to england who visited four brighton attractions between the years 1980 to 2010. The data is calibrated in per centum which is clearly and coherently represented.
Overall, it is evident that Pavilion was the most favourite attraction of the tourists as well as tourists also preferred to visit festivals in england, while art gallary and pier had the least number of visitors.
It can be seen that in the year 1980, the visitors to art gallary were about 21% which constantly increased to approximately 40% after which the figure fluctuated slightly and dropped to a low of about 9% in the last year. Moreover, 20% tourists firstly started visiting Pavilion in the year 1980 which drastically reached to the peak point
With regards the percentage of visitors to pier in the year 1985, the percentage of visitors to festival attractions was high. Furthermore, figure of pier attraction followed a fluctuating trend until 2010. Apart from that, visitors to pier and festival in the year 2010 was 21% and 29% respectively.
- The two pie charts below show the average household expenditures in a country in 1950 and 2010. 78
- Recently the freedom to work and live anywhere has become the main trend due to the development of communication technology and transportation.Do the advantages of these developments outweigh the disadvantages? Discuss. 73
- one should obly use enough money to fulfill their needs and rest should be given to needy . To what extent you agree or disagree ? 73
- Some people believe they should keep all the money they have earned and should not pay tax to the state. Do you agree ar disagree? 61
- The charts below show the percentage of their food budget the average family spent on restaurant meals in different years. The graph shows the number of meals eaten in fast food restaurants and sit-down restaurants.You should write at least 150 words. 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 340, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ch drastically reached to the peak point With regards the percentage of visitors ...
^^^
Line 7, column 43, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...th regards the percentage of visitors to pier in the year 1985, the percentage of...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, furthermore, moreover, so, well, while, apart from, as to, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 3.15609756098 253% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 913.0 965.302439024 95% => OK
No of words: 180.0 196.424390244 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.07222222222 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.66284150148 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81733500727 2.65546596893 106% => OK
Unique words: 103.0 106.607317073 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.572222222222 0.547539520022 105% => OK
syllable_count: 262.8 283.868780488 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 67.0409561083 43.030603864 156% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.428571429 112.824112599 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.7142857143 22.9334400587 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 13.0 5.23603664747 248% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.145410371185 0.215688989381 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.074332701545 0.103423049105 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0911064535487 0.0843802449381 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.104333944494 0.15604864568 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0706994186814 0.0819641961636 86% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 13.2329268293 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 61.2550243902 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.3012195122 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 11.4140731707 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.82 8.06136585366 109% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.