The given line chart illustrates the percentage of visitors to four distinctive destinations in Scotland over a period starting from 1980 and ending in 2010.
Overall, both the zoos and the castles had an upward trend, the opposite pattern could be seen for the aquariums and the festivals between 1980 and 2010. It is also clear that castles were the most popular attractions in Scotland over the timescale.
In 1980, the percentage of tourists to the castles and the zoos was 25% and 10% respectively. In the next fifteen years, the number of visitors to the castles increased dramatically and the castles’ line reached the highest point at approximately 45% in 1995. After that, the castles’ figure plummeted considerably to nearly 35% at the end of the period. In contrast, the percentage of travellers to the zoos in Scotland fluctuated around 10% and 15% over the first twenty years. Finally, the zoos’ line reached its peak of over 20% after experiencing a sharp rise in the last ten years of this period.
Looking at other destinations, the respective percentage of travellers to the aquariums and the festivals was 20% and 30% in 1980. Five years later, the aquariums attracted the highest number of visitors with 35% before gradually falling to under 10% in 2010. The festivals’ figure saw a stable drop over the whole period and got the lowest at roughly 15% in the last year of this timescale.
- Some people think that people who choose a job early and keep doing it are more likely to have a satisfying career life than those who frequently change jobs To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
- The diagram below shows the production and processing of milk and dairy products for commercial sale Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The diagram shows the life cycle of a frog Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features 84
- The graph below shows changes in the share of vehicle registrations of the three most common types of commercial vehicles in the US between 1970 and 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where rel
- The chart shows the proportion of renewable energy in total energy supply in 4 countries from 1997 to 2010 89
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, first, if, look, so, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 33.7804878049 139% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1180.0 965.302439024 122% => OK
No of words: 239.0 196.424390244 122% => OK
Chars per words: 4.93723849372 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.93187294222 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79628160966 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 122.0 106.607317073 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.510460251046 0.547539520022 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 337.5 283.868780488 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 10.0 4.33902439024 230% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 24.0835323183 43.030603864 56% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 107.272727273 112.824112599 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.7272727273 22.9334400587 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.27272727273 5.23603664747 82% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.192709127042 0.215688989381 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0797617327161 0.103423049105 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0764498886544 0.0843802449381 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.14167342062 0.15604864568 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.082469867918 0.0819641961636 101% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.2329268293 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.37 11.4140731707 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.59 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 40.7170731707 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.