The line graph below shows the percentage of tourists to Scotland who visited four different attractions in Edinburgh. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
Write at least 150 words.
The given line graph demonstrates the proportion of tourists visiting four Edinburgh attactions, namely aquarium, castle, zoo and festival in Scotland between 1980 and 2010.
According to the graph, the castle and the aquarium were the favourite acttractions in 1980 and in 2010. In 1980, the least popular acttraction was the zoo. But, from 2005 to 2010, the aquarium was the least admired one.
In 1980, the aquarium was visited by appromixately 25% of tourists, the this number increased sharply and peaked at 45% in 1995. After that, the percentage went down to 30% in 2010. The trend for the aquarium was similar to the castle. From 1980 to 1985, visitors went up rapidly from 20% to 25%, then sharply dropped to nearly 10% in 2010. There was an inconsiderable fluctuation in the number of tourists visiting the festival. In general, this number remained stable at about 27%. The number of visitors going to the zoo fluctuated from 1980 to 2005, then increased sharply and reached a peak of 20% in 2010.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...val in Scotland between 1980 and 2010. According to the graph, the castle and t...
^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...he aquarium was the least admired one. In 1980, the aquarium was visited by app...
^^
Line 3, column 71, Rule ID: DT_DT[2]
Message: Maybe you need to remove the second determiner so that only 'the' or 'this' is left.
Suggestion: the; this
...sited by appromixately 25% of tourists, the this number increased sharply and peaked at ...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, then, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 841.0 965.302439024 87% => OK
No of words: 172.0 196.424390244 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.88953488372 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.62144681703 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65164086877 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 92.0 106.607317073 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.53488372093 0.547539520022 98% => OK
syllable_count: 226.8 283.868780488 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 9.0 4.33902439024 207% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 22.4926829268 67% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 38.7611887339 43.030603864 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 76.4545454545 112.824112599 68% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.6363636364 22.9334400587 68% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.90909090909 5.23603664747 36% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.101307253828 0.215688989381 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0443126057359 0.103423049105 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0486113057709 0.0843802449381 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0943126539785 0.15604864568 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0616021380827 0.0819641961636 75% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.4 13.2329268293 71% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 81.63 61.2550243902 133% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 5.6 10.3012195122 54% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 10.79 11.4140731707 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.78 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 11.4329268293 57% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.9970731707 73% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.