The line graph compares birth rates in China and the US and how these rates changed from 1920 to 2000
The line graph compares birth rates in China and the US and how these rates changed from 1920 to 2000.
Overall, the birth rates of both nations decreased over the period of 80 years. Although the two trends were similar in terms of a general decline, the birth rate of the USA in most years was higher than that of China.
In the 1920-1935 period, the birth rate in America fluctuated, although it always remained above 10%. However, in the following decade, the American birth rate fell sharply to below 5%. In the 1950s, the figure for the USA increased significantly to exactly 15%, which was its highest point during the 80-year period, there was a gradual decline in the US birth rate, which fell to 7% by the year 2000.
Over the same period, the birth rate in China varied more significantly than in the US. It dropped to 5% from 1940 to 1945 before reaching the highest point of the whole line graph, 20% in 1950. By contrast, 5 year later, the birth rate in China decreased rapidly by over 10% falling to approximately 2% in 2000.
- The chart shows the division of household tasks by gender in Great Britain Write a report for a university lecture describing the information shown below 78
- Nowadays many people have access to computers on a wide basis and a large number of children play computer games What are the positive and negative impacts of playing computer games and what can be done to minimize the bad effects 84
- Some people think that people who choose a job early and keep doing it are more likely to get a satisfying career life than those who frequently change jobs. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 56
- Some people think that there should be some strict controls about noise. Others think that they could just make as much noise as they want. Discuss both views and give your opinion 56
- The line graph below shows the percentage of tourists to England who visited four different attractions in Brighton.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 156, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...o 1945 before reaching the highest point of the whole line graph, 20% in 1950. By...
^^
Line 4, column 314, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...0% falling to approximately 2% in 2000.
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 859.0 965.302439024 89% => OK
No of words: 189.0 196.424390244 96% => OK
Chars per words: 4.54497354497 4.92477711251 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.70779275107 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.30852812225 2.65546596893 87% => OK
Unique words: 103.0 106.607317073 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.544973544974 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 247.5 283.868780488 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.8109731135 43.030603864 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.4444444444 112.824112599 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0 22.9334400587 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.22222222222 5.23603664747 23% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.544654376142 0.215688989381 253% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.255284244209 0.103423049105 247% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.266042380593 0.0843802449381 315% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.437917048143 0.15604864568 281% => Maybe some contents are duplicated.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.328822592957 0.0819641961636 401% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.5 13.2329268293 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 75.54 61.2550243902 123% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.05 11.4140731707 79% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.6 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.