The line graph given illustrates the number of air pollutants discharged from various sources in the UK during the period from 1999 to 2005.
Overall, it is evident that the figure for total air pollutants reduced tremendously over the given period. Meanwhile, air pollutants released from the industry took the lead among other sources of air pollutants.
Starting at 7 million tonnes of air pollutants, the number of total air pollutants declined significantly to 4 million tonnes in 1999. There was a minimal reduction of about 2 million tonnes from 1999 to 2002. Total air pollutants experienced a rapid fall to around 3.2 million tonnes in the final year.
In 1990, the statistics of air pollutants from industry was highest with approximately 5.5 million tonnes, compared to these transport and households were the same with less than 1 million ton. The number of air pollutants from industry plunged 3 million tonnes in 1996, decreasing further to the bottom of 1 million tons at the end of the stage. While transport saw a leveling off 1 million tons during the period of fifty years, there was a gradual decline to nearly zero in 2005.
The line graph given illustrates the number of air pollutants discharged from various sources in the UK during the period from 1999 to 2005.
Overall, it is evident that the figure for total air pollutants reduced tremendously over the given period. Meanwhile, air pollutants released from the industry took the lead among other sources of air pollutants.
Starting at 7 million tonnes of air pollutants, the number of total air pollutants declined significantly to 4 million tonnes in 1999. There was a minimal reduction of about 2 million tonnes from 1999 to 2002. Total air pollutants experienced a rapid fall to around 3.2 million tonnes in the final year.
In 1990, the statistics of air pollutants from industry was highest with approximately 5.5 million tonnes, compared to these transport and households were the same with less than 1 million ton. The number of air pollutants from industry plunged 3 million tonnes in 1996, decreasing further to the bottom of 1 million tons at the end of the stage. While transport saw a leveling off 1 million tons during the period of fifty years, there was a gradual decline to nearly zero in 2005.
- some people nowadays believe that modern technology has made shopping easier while others disagree Discuss both views and give your opinion 78
- It is obvious that nowadays there is an increasing number of people purchasing well known designer labels of consumer products While this trend can account for some primary reasons I strongly believe that this is a negative tendency There are two principa 78
- The table illustrates how much money was donated to developing countries in the period 2006 2010 by US and EU charities to support technological development Overall it is clear that total aid increased during this period US aid was considerably higher tha 56
- It is true that many art galleries and historical buildings are primarily visited by people from other regions not the locals While there are several reasons to account for this phenomenon some measures should be taken to make these places more attractive 61
- The table illustrates how much money was donated to developing countries in the period 2006 2010 by US and EU charities to support technological development Overall it is clear that total aid increased during this period US aid was considerably higher tha 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...K during the period from 1999 to 2005. Overall, it is evident that the figure f...
^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...among other sources of air pollutants. Starting at 7 million tonnes of air poll...
^^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... 3.2 million tonnes in the final year. In 1990, the statistics of air pollutant...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 1.0 6.8 15% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 33.7804878049 118% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 961.0 965.302439024 100% => OK
No of words: 193.0 196.424390244 98% => OK
Chars per words: 4.9792746114 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.72725689877 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74161328317 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 102.0 106.607317073 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.528497409326 0.547539520022 97% => OK
syllable_count: 276.3 283.868780488 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.5010595005 43.030603864 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.777777778 112.824112599 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.4444444444 22.9334400587 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.44444444444 5.23603664747 28% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.500210159824 0.215688989381 232% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.254337424637 0.103423049105 246% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.223647049261 0.0843802449381 265% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.407964024458 0.15604864568 261% => Maybe some contents are duplicated.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.243391757434 0.0819641961636 297% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.2329268293 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.6 11.4140731707 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.03 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.