Line graph : radio and television audiences in UK, 01.00 – 24.00 in October to December 1992.
The figure elucidates the number of the audiences of two medias in the UK between 01.00 and 24.00. At first glance, it is evident that the most noticeable alterations occurred in the amount of television audiences over the entire period, and it is measured in the percentage of the UK population.
To begin with, there was a gradual palpitation in the percentage of television audiences from 01.00, which was at just above 5 in 100, through to 11.00, which made up at just below 5%. Afterwards, the number of audiences from this media uplifted, soaring to just beneath a half over the following 10 hours, and erratically, it plunged dramatically to just under two-tenths by the end of the period shown.
In accordance with radio audiences, 01.00 to 06.00 witnessed an oscillated trend for the percentage of radio audiences in which it stood approximately at well beyond five-hundredths in 01.00 and achieved at the same percentage in 06.00. Unexpectedly, it jumped tremendously to a quarter in the next 2 hours, nevertheless, the percentage of this media plummeted highly between 08.00 and 24.00 to finish at well under one-tenths.
- Line graph : Clothing Export in 1999 - 2003 in Japan, Colombia and Myanmar. 73
- The maps summarise the changes to Liverpool john moores university from 2010 to 2016 71
- Bar chart : Shares of expenditures for selected categories, United States, Canada, United Kingdom and Japan, 2009. 73
- A growing number of people feel that animals should not be exploited by people and that they should have the same rights as humans while others argue that humans must employ animals to satisfy their various needs including uses for food and research. Disc 73
- some people think newspaper is the most effective way to obtain the latest information because it has more influence than other forms of media. 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 341, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
... hours, nevertheless, the percentage of this media plummeted highly between 08.00 an...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, nevertheless, so, well, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 49.0 33.7804878049 145% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 950.0 965.302439024 98% => OK
No of words: 188.0 196.424390244 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.05319148936 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.70287850203 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.09252592776 2.65546596893 116% => OK
Unique words: 104.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.553191489362 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 279.9 283.868780488 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 31.0 22.4926829268 138% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 43.7099022597 43.030603864 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 158.333333333 112.824112599 140% => OK
Words per sentence: 31.3333333333 22.9334400587 137% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0 5.23603664747 153% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.347657705029 0.215688989381 161% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.190892091681 0.103423049105 185% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.119892478576 0.0843802449381 142% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.255042888925 0.15604864568 163% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0799957226989 0.0819641961636 98% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.0 13.2329268293 136% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.47 61.2550243902 79% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.3012195122 138% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.6 11.4140731707 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.37 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.4 10.9970731707 131% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.0658536585 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.