The chart illustrates the gold sales during 2002 in Dubai and is measured in million of Dirhams. Overall, by the end of the year, the sales remained more or less consistent.
The sales of gold started at 200 million of Dirhams in the month of January, which significantly rose to 350 million dirhams in the mid April and then it gradually dropped during the next three months, with just above 100 million dirham sales in July. The sales again increased up to 200 million dirhams during August after which the sales in September equated to the sales in July. Later, the sales improved to just below 200 million dirhams after which they remained stable during the next two months at approximately 180 million dirhams and in December they rose very slightly to 195 million dirhams.
To conclude, the sales of gold in Dubai showed fluctuations during 2002, however by the end of 2002 it reached the prize at which it got started initially.
- The charts below show the reasons why people travel to work by bicycle or by car.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 73
- The Processes below show how glass containers, such as bottles, are produced and recycled. 56
- The Processes below show how glass containers, such as bottles, are produced and recycled. 61
- The charts below give information on the ages of the populations of Yemen and Italy in 2000 and projections for 2050.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 11
- The Processes below show how glass containers, such as bottles, are produced and recycled. 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 78, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a million'.
Suggestion: a million
...during 2002 in Dubai and is measured in million of Dirhams. Overall, by the end of the ...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 423, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... Later, the sales improved to just below 200 million dirhams after which they rem...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, then, more or less
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 1.0 7.0 14% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 779.0 965.302439024 81% => OK
No of words: 163.0 196.424390244 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.77914110429 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.57311423478 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.41432674174 2.65546596893 91% => OK
Unique words: 79.0 106.607317073 74% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.484662576687 0.547539520022 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 227.7 283.868780488 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 63.1385161547 43.030603864 147% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.833333333 112.824112599 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.1666666667 22.9334400587 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.16666666667 5.23603664747 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.310065889089 0.215688989381 144% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.186206205655 0.103423049105 180% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0948407286028 0.0843802449381 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.240394158762 0.15604864568 154% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0328605426594 0.0819641961636 40% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.2329268293 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.99 61.2550243902 100% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.74 11.4140731707 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.78 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 29.0 40.7170731707 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.