Given is the line graph contrasting the global demand for distinct textile fibers during a period of 5 years, commencing from 1980.
Perceptibly, the volume of Polyester and Coton leaped in every 5 years while the opposite was true for Cellulosic and Wool. Moreover, the number of Polyester and Coton was far higher than that of Cellulosic and Wool.
When it comes to the figure of Polyester global consumend, it leaped from 5% to approximately 32% in 1999 before proliferating remarkably to merely 69% in 2015 and became the best selling textile fibers. Likewise, Coton escalated to somewhere in the vicinity of 20% to 30% before the 2000s, however, it leaped to 32% in 2015 and second most popular after Polyester. Conversely, Cellulosic and Wool were not as popular as the other two. Cellulosic has started unfavorable when it just nudge down slowly from a negligible 6% to approximately 1% in 1999 before leaping remarkably to merely 10% in 2015. As for Wool, it swelled from 4% to 8% in 1999 but then plummented to 0% and became the least favored item.
- More and more people are becoming seriously overweight Some people think a solution can be to increase the price of fattening foods To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- The graph below shows the average carbon dioxide CO2 emissions per person in the United Kingdom Sweden Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 11
- It is neither possible nor useful for a country to provide university places for a high proportion of young people Agree or disagree 56
- The charts below show the performance of a bus company in terms of punctuality both actual and target what actually happened compared to what the company was trying to achieve and the number of complaints and passengers Summarize the information by select 73
- The diagrams below give information about the manufacture of frozen fish pies Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, conversely, however, if, likewise, moreover, second, so, then, well, while, as for
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 878.0 965.302439024 91% => OK
No of words: 182.0 196.424390244 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.82417582418 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.67297393991 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77635138947 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 106.0 106.607317073 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.582417582418 0.547539520022 106% => OK
syllable_count: 270.9 283.868780488 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 3.36585365854 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.5616814247 43.030603864 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.75 112.824112599 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.75 22.9334400587 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.875 5.23603664747 208% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.156131878513 0.215688989381 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0700231846218 0.103423049105 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.103780272035 0.0843802449381 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.144316108005 0.15604864568 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.137288474613 0.0819641961636 167% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.2329268293 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 61.2550243902 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.97 11.4140731707 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.28 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.