Opinions diverge on whether the leap in average life expectancy makes a positive feature for almost fields of the community instead of drawbacks. Although this sentient can be justified to some certain extent, I am in opposition owing to some rational reasons.
Admittedly, the aging population is conducive to growing businesses, the economy, and society. When the number of seniors is higher, the demand for using healthcare services hikes. Hence, it results in expanding medical, simultaneously, creating enormous revenues for the economy. Moreover, elderly people can have a part in impulsing the development of society by raising general awareness and taking a part in community services as well as volunteer work. This can be explained by the fact that juvenile delinquency in countries with a young population has an escalation in the crime rate as their awareness, however, the opposite is true for high longevity ones. Strikingly, senior citizens are not full-time employed, they are able to devote themselves to community and government projects after they are retired.
Conversely, I express my strong support that the geriatric population is a vital factor do a great disservice to a country. When it comes to economic development, social welfare and pensions are a drain on public sending, putting heavy pressure on the national budget and manpower. As a result, it requires the government to supplement more resources for aged care, which will leave little support for other areas, causing stagnation in the growth of the economy. For society, a decline in the working-age population leads to a shortage of employers in certain vital sectors, such as technology or computer science, fields that expect creativity and innovation. This means the young workforce have to work hard and have to bear a greater tax burden to take care of themselves as well as the elderly at the same time. To be more accurate, if a country has an aging population, the foreign direct investment for large enterprises will deflate significantly. The reason is that global investors accept to give a huge payment provided that it is extremely high efficiency, while over-the-hill laborers cannot respond to this demand because of their age.
In conclusion, there have been different perspectives about whether the aging population is good or bad for the development of most domains of a country.
- The chart below shows the percentages of males and females with higher education qualifications in 5 countries in 2001 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- The diagram illustrates how bees produce honey Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 84
- The pictures below show the process of making clothes from recycled plastic bottles Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- The diagram shows the design of a modern landfill for household waste Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The aging population is good for business the economy and society Others disagree Discuss both views and give your opinion 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
conversely, hence, however, if, moreover, so, well, while, in conclusion, such as, as a result, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 8.3376753507 228% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2007.0 1615.20841683 124% => OK
No of words: 382.0 315.596192385 121% => OK
Chars per words: 5.25392670157 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.42095241839 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96723909148 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 228.0 176.041082164 130% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.596858638743 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 652.5 506.74238477 129% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 7.0 2.52805611222 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 6.0 2.10420841683 285% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.3205670901 49.4020404114 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.4375 106.682146367 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.875 20.7667163134 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.625 7.06120827912 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.183729810661 0.244688304435 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0549467351229 0.084324248473 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0442455415664 0.0667982634062 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.108647773679 0.151304729494 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0402432664291 0.056905535591 71% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 13.0946893788 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.47 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.9 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 124.0 78.4519038076 158% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.