The line graph shows the global demand for different textile fibers between 1980 and 2015. Units are measured in million tonnes.
Given is the line graph delineating the demand of fabrics used in garment in every five years, commencing from 1980 to 2015. It is perceptible that there was a drastic plunge of Woll users, while the reverse was true for the other textile fibers. Although there was a fluctuation in the figure of all fabrics, noticeably to see 2 groups of objects: popular and rarely used.
During this investigation period, can be seen as a race for Polyester and Cotton to be the top of the most used type of material in garments. The first 15 years recorded a proliferation of those two fabrics, especially the Polyester beggin at 5 million tones worse than cotton about 10 million tones but at the cross of 1995 again showed the breakout of Polyester, it surpass cotton and swell by approximately 60 million tones while cotton is only a little over 20 million tones. And after that period from 1995, it was believed that polyester became the most popular because of the antifouling ability.
Conversely, for the two other fabrics Cellulosic and woll, from the beginning period, they were not trusted by the user. Even the woll, it was almost contract for all 25 years and hit its bottom of the number 0. Toward Cellulosic, there was an exiguous population using them but in the latter half of the period (after 2000), show a little flourish that people have chosen that fabric more and reached the top at 10 million tons.
- The diagrams below give information about the manufacture of frozen fish pies Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 11
- It is neither possible nor useful for a country to provide university places for a high proportion of young people Agree or disagree 56
- The graphs show changes in the trends of the urban and rural population and by different age groups from 1950 to 2040 67
- The maps show a road system as it is now and the proposed changes in future to reduce the number of accidents Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant Write at least 150 words 73
- The diagrams below show the changes that have taken place at West Park Secondary School since its construction in 1950 Summarize the information by selectin and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 79
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 369, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'surpasses'?
Suggestion: surpasses
...in showed the breakout of Polyester, it surpass cotton and swell by approximately 60 mi...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, conversely, first, if, well, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 7.0 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 5.60731707317 250% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1162.0 965.302439024 120% => OK
No of words: 248.0 196.424390244 126% => OK
Chars per words: 4.68548387097 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.96837696647 3.73543355544 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.52318850444 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 146.0 106.607317073 137% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.588709677419 0.547539520022 108% => OK
syllable_count: 355.5 283.868780488 125% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 1.53170731707 326% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 71.7647046918 43.030603864 167% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.111111111 112.824112599 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.5555555556 22.9334400587 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.33333333333 5.23603664747 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.145482307071 0.215688989381 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0552693330986 0.103423049105 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0556793595254 0.0843802449381 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0978551862195 0.15604864568 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0369440541164 0.0819641961636 45% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.2329268293 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.99 61.2550243902 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.22 11.4140731707 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.67 8.06136585366 108% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 40.7170731707 142% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.