The line graph shows the global demand for different textile fibers between 1980 and 2015
Given is the map delineating the global need for distinct textile fibers over a period of 35 years, commencing from 1980.
Perceptibly, the demand for almost all categories leaped over the years, except for wool. Furthermore, the polyester became by far the most favored textile compared to the others in the last mentioned years.
In regards to the number of cotton and polyester, cotton with 15 million tons purchased was the dominant choice which was tripled the polyester in size/number in 1980. These figures surged exponentially and thereafter reached the similar level at 20 million tons 15 years later. Afterwards, the demand for polyester surpassed cotton when its number swelled to 70 million tons which was a half bigger than that of cotton in 2015.
In terms of the 2 remaining fibers consumed, both of them had almost the same demand with just a little bit bigger in number of the cellulosic in 1980. Before the year 2000, the figures of cellulosic deflated and nearly bottomed while the opposite was true for the wool. After that, the demand for cellulosic suddenly ratcheted up to 10 million tons while there was almost no one purchased the other.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-19 | M10 | 73 | view |
| 2023-08-15 | Phạm Minh Hân | 84 | view |
| 2023-08-15 | Phạm Minh Hân | 84 | view |
| 2022-12-21 | kevann | 56 | view |
| 2022-11-01 | quaan_ne | 78 | view |
- The chart show the different how three countries learn English in 2010 and 2015 67
- The chart show the different how three countries learn English in 2010 and 2015 67
- The map shows how coastal land develops into a coastal park 78
- The maps below show the centre of a small town called Islip as it is now and plans for its development Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- Look at the two maps of Sunnyhills University campus in 1995 and today Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: IN_REGARD_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'regarding' or 'with regard to'.
Suggestion: Regarding; With regard to
...he others in the last mentioned years. In regards to the number of cotton and polyester, cot...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 98, Rule ID: LITTLE_BIT[1]
Message: Reduce redundancy by using 'little' or 'bit'.
Suggestion: little; bit
... had almost the same demand with just a little bit bigger in number of the cellulosic in 1...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 109, Rule ID: ADJECTIVE_IN_ATTRIBUTE[1]
Message: A more concise phrase may lose no meaning and sound more powerful.
Suggestion: bigger
... the same demand with just a little bit bigger in number of the cellulosic in 1980. Before the y...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, well, while, except for
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 972.0 965.302439024 101% => OK
No of words: 196.0 196.424390244 100% => OK
Chars per words: 4.95918367347 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.74165738677 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56018761026 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 112.0 106.607317073 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.571428571429 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 286.2 283.868780488 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 22.6246887981 43.030603864 53% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 108.0 112.824112599 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.7777777778 22.9334400587 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0 5.23603664747 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.198098107707 0.215688989381 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0849313293206 0.103423049105 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0639566672266 0.0843802449381 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.134010812348 0.15604864568 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0565458370036 0.0819641961636 69% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.2329268293 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.49 11.4140731707 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.3 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.