The line graph shows the number of people who used different communication services in the world.
Units: per 100 inhabitants
The line graph compares the quantity of users of five different interaction services per 100 inhabitants from 1998 to 2008.
It is clear that all services gained more popularity, and cellular phone service witnessed the fastest growth in the average number of users over the period shown.
In 1998, landline service was the most common way for people to keep in touch, at about 15 out of 100 people, tripling the figures to cellular phone and Internet services, with approximately 5 per 100 people using each. In the next decade, the quantity of landline service users recorded a stability. In contrast, more people opted for cellular phone service to communicate with others, with its fugures soaring to over 60%, compared to a gradual climb to roughly 20% in the Internet service's figure.
From 1998 to 2002, no one used mobile or fixed broadband to interact, but both then showed a marginal growth to just under 10 per 100 inhabitants in 2008. In general, the popularity of those services was nearly equal all the time.
- The line graph shows the number of people who used different communication services in the world Units per 100 inhabitants 74
- ĐỀ BÀI: The line graph shows the number of people who used different communication services in the world.Units: per 100 inhabitants 67
- The line graph shows the number of people who used different communication services in the world.Units: per 100 inhabitants 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 302, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...ine service users recorded a stability. In contrast, more people opted for cellula...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, so, then, in contrast, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 858.0 965.302439024 89% => OK
No of words: 174.0 196.424390244 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.93103448276 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.63192868298 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54690442619 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 105.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.603448275862 0.547539520022 110% => OK
syllable_count: 262.8 283.868780488 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 3.36585365854 238% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.2771580606 43.030603864 119% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.571428571 112.824112599 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.8571428571 22.9334400587 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 5.23603664747 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.323397436444 0.215688989381 150% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.136426843536 0.103423049105 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0850856906969 0.0843802449381 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.190294925673 0.15604864568 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0757698630458 0.0819641961636 92% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.2329268293 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 61.2550243902 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.61 11.4140731707 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.73 8.06136585366 108% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.