The given line graph illustrates the how many people used different kind of communication services in the whole world from 1998 to 2008
Overall, the usage of cellular phone services was high in among other services while the use of mobile broadband services was quite low. However, the landline services was almost steady in the whole period.
As presented in the line graph in 1998 the percentage of consumption of internet and cellular phone service was almost equally start which was around 5% and over the next few years the cellular service was rapidly increased and the internet service was gradually increased and in 2008 the used of internet services was just 20 percent whereas the cellular phone services was the highest percent of usage which was around 60%.
The used of mobile broadband in 1998 was 0% and the next 6 year it was remain same percent after 2004 it was slowly raised and the used of Mobile broadband and fixed broadband was almost same in 2008 which was approximately 5% and the usage of landline service was roughly 15% in 1998 and in 2008 it was somehow increased and the consumption was 19%
- The line graph shows the number of people who used different communication services in the world Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant Units per 100 inhabitants 68
- The bar chart below shows the production of the world s oil in OPEC and non OPEC countries Write a short report for a university lecturer describing the information shown below 67
- Radio and Television Audiences in UK October December 1992 67
- The chart below shows the places visited by different people living in Canada Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 70
- The chart below shows the number of men and women in further education in Britain in three periods and whether they were studying full time or part time 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 34, Rule ID: THE_HOW[1]
Message: Did you mean 'how'?
Suggestion: how
The given line graph illustrates the how many people used different kind of comm...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 375, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... whereas the cellular phone services was the highest percent of usage which was a...
^^
Line 7, column 72, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'remained'.
Suggestion: remained
... 1998 was 0% and the next 6 year it was remain same percent after 2004 it was slowly r...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, so, whereas, while, kind of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 7.0 257% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 936.0 965.302439024 97% => OK
No of words: 195.0 196.424390244 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.8 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.73687570622 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.43443410837 2.65546596893 92% => OK
Unique words: 81.0 106.607317073 76% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.415384615385 0.547539520022 76% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 283.5 283.868780488 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 3.36585365854 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 4.0 8.94146341463 45% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 48.0 22.4926829268 213% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 132.87470602 43.030603864 309% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 234.0 112.824112599 207% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 48.75 22.9334400587 213% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 10.0 5.23603664747 191% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.107398587018 0.215688989381 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.089420912469 0.103423049105 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0743125203994 0.0843802449381 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.10923520744 0.15604864568 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0809528039981 0.0819641961636 99% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 25.6 13.2329268293 193% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 31.22 61.2550243902 51% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 20.8 10.3012195122 202% => Flesch kincaid grade is high.
coleman_liau_index: 11.45 11.4140731707 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.2 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 27.0 40.7170731707 66% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 17.5 11.4329268293 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 21.2 10.9970731707 193% => OK
text_standard: 21.0 11.0658536585 190% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.