The line graph shows the number of players in four different sports (badminton, tennis, basketball, rugby) in a particular European country between 1985 and 2005.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The presented line graph compares 4 distinct sports in terms of their numbers of people getting involved in a certain European nation from 1985 to 2005.
Overall, it is evident that except for rugby, discernible modifications were witnessed in the figures for three remaining sports. However, while the number of citizens playing tennis and badminton declined, an upward trend can be observed in those playing basketball.
Turning into detail, in 1985, badminton and tennis shared the same amount of players, ranking first among 4 categories with 200 residents. In the next 2 decades, the figure for badminton declined dramatically to 50 people in 2005. Meanwhile, despite a fluctuation as well as a general downward trend, that of tennis still remained about 180 players at the end of this period.
Regarding to other sports, basketball and rugby had similar numbers of competitors in 1985, which reached about 50 citizens. However, throughout the remainders of the period, the value for basketball increased gradually before significantly expanding, surpassing remaining sectors as the most popular sports with over 200 players in 2005. By contrast, rugby is the only sport of which the participant figure was kept unchanged over the period.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-07 | Nguyễn Thạch Bảo Ngọc | 73 | view |
| 2023-07-07 | Nguyễn Thạch Bảo Ngọc | 73 | view |
- People today do not feel safe either at home or when they are out. What are the causes? What are the solutions? 11
- Schools are no longer necessary because children can get so much information available through the internet, and they can study just as well at home. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 84
- The pie charts below show the average household expenditures in Japan and Malaysia in the year 2010.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 78
- The population of many cities is growing rapidly What are the effects on people living in these cities What can be done to maintain the quality of life of these people 89
- The chart shows the average annual pay for doctors and other workers in 7 different countries in 2004.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 84
Comments
Hello! where I can find the…
Hello! where I can find the chart to this task?
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 445, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ure was kept unchanged over the period.
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, regarding, still, well, while, except for, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1059.0 965.302439024 110% => OK
No of words: 196.0 196.424390244 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.40306122449 4.92477711251 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.74165738677 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80982594198 2.65546596893 106% => OK
Unique words: 129.0 106.607317073 121% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.658163265306 0.547539520022 120% => OK
syllable_count: 300.6 283.868780488 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.4703093249 43.030603864 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.666666667 112.824112599 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.7777777778 22.9334400587 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.11111111111 5.23603664747 155% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.177648305414 0.215688989381 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0691366407606 0.103423049105 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0510123141975 0.0843802449381 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.109685213742 0.15604864568 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0540104737233 0.0819641961636 66% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.2329268293 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.04 11.4140731707 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.19 8.06136585366 114% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 40.7170731707 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.