The line graph shows the percentage of different age groups of cinema visitors in a particular country from 1978 to 2008. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The line graph provides a breakdown on the level of people visiting cinema in four different age groups in a particular country between 1978 and 2008.
According to the diagram, it is clear that there was a nearly similar between the lines of visitors who were over 50 and who were 14-24 years old over a 30-year period. First and foremost, in 1978, 90% of cinema visitors in this country were 14-24 years old. This figure was much higher than this of over 50-year-old people, which stood at 40%. After that, these proportions decreased considerably to under 80% for 14-24-year-old people and 20% for over 50-year-old people in 1988. Thereafter, both of the proportions of two age groups steadily increased and levelled off at the same point with the number of 1978 until 2003. After these changes, the difference between the trends of two age groups emerged. While the percentage of over 50-year-old people visiting cinema moderately climbed and finished at 50% in 2008, the ratio of people in the 14-24 age group declined an amount which is the same as the increasing amount of people in the over 50 age group. Obviously, the percentage of people in the 14-24 age group was still higher than this in the over 50 age group over the period change.
In addition, similar to the aforementioned groups, the remaining groups had the trends which were quite alike. To begin with, in 1978, there were 80% and 60% respectively for cinema visitors who were 25-34 years old and who were 35-49 years old. After this year, the lines representing people in these age groups dropped the same amount until 1988. Then the rate of 35-49-year-old people going to the cinema noticeably rose to more than 60% in 1998 and remained constant at that point until 2003. Similarly, the proportion of people in the 25-34 age group also went up to 70% and remained stable at this proportion till 2003. After 2003, both of these percentages slightly fell up to 2008.
Overall, it may be concluded that cinema visitors in all age groups declined through the period shown, except for people in the over 50 age group.
- Many children participate in social networks on the Internet instead of participating in community activities in their neighbourhood What are the advantages and disadvantages of this situation 86
- Some countries are struggling with increases in crime rates Some believe that having more police on the streets is best way to reduce and combat crime To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
- Some parents believe that reading books for entertainment is a waste of time for children and they think that their children should only read serious educational books What is your opinion 61
- The diagram gives information about the process of making carbonated drinks Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- Some educationalists say that every child should be taught how to play a musical instrument To what extent do you agree or disagree 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, if, may, similarly, so, still, then, while, except for, in addition, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 7.0 186% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 3.15609756098 349% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 16.0 5.60731707317 285% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 74.0 33.7804878049 219% => Less preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1730.0 965.302439024 179% => OK
No of words: 362.0 196.424390244 184% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.77900552486 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.36191444098 3.73543355544 117% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.50888351762 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 155.0 106.607317073 145% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.42817679558 0.547539520022 78% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 494.1 283.868780488 174% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.07073170732 467% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 3.36585365854 297% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 8.94146341463 179% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.7821516523 43.030603864 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.125 112.824112599 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.625 22.9334400587 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.9375 5.23603664747 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 12.0 4.09268292683 293% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.183524731098 0.215688989381 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0869205025211 0.103423049105 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0774436733897 0.0843802449381 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.178537741623 0.15604864568 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.09100683866 0.0819641961636 111% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.2329268293 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.74 11.4140731707 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.04 8.06136585366 87% => OK
difficult_words: 53.0 40.7170731707 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.